Elder Patriot – Investigative journalist John Solomon added more evidence to the massive amount that’s already been amassed proving disgraced former FBI Director James Comey was intent on protecting the filthy criminal organization that ran the Democratic Party.
Last night he joined Hannity to discuss what he had learned about a pending immunity deal for WikiLeaks’ Julian Assange that Comey had squashed:
Solomon told Hannity what any clear-thinking investigator would say:
“I would love to see the evidence he was going to provide. He was going to provide technical evidence that would answer who did not provide these documents. That would be critical to any investigation and why it was turned away is a great mystery to me. We should want transparency in this story.”
Exactly, who wouldn’t want transparency in this story? If one of America’s two major political parties or its candidate for president was involved in a global racketeering scheme why wouldn’t the FBI director want to know?
According to Solomon a limited immunity deal – in exchange for limited (but important) information – had been worked out between the DOJ’s David Laufman, then head of Justice’s counterintelligence and export controls section, and Assange.
The initial outreach from Assange occurred in January of 2017 when Assange’s legal team approached Adam Waldman to see if the incoming Trump administration would be willing to negotiate with him. Walman is an attorney and a former Clinton Justice Department official with significant government ties. Assange’s team hoped Walman might be able to navigate the U.S. law enforcement bureaucracy and find the right people to engage.
“But an unexpected intervention by Comey — relayed through Warner — soured the negotiations…”
WAT!!! The FBI director and the leading Democrat on the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence (SSCI) weren’t interested in a limited immunity deal for the one man who might’ve unwound everything?
To put this in perspective, Comey authorized complete immunity for every HRC associate despite mountains of evidence of their criminal activities and the ordered the FBI to destroy the evidence against them, as well.
Warner was privy to all of this and he just stood silent? More likely he was an important player in orchestrating the entire scenario.
Warner can’t run away from his involvement now:
“Warner engaged with Waldman over encrypted text messages, then reached out to Comey. A few days later, Warner contacted Waldman with an unexpected plea.
“He told me he had just talked with Comey and that, while the government was appreciative of my efforts, my instructions were to stand down, to end the discussions with Assange,” Waldman told me. Waldman offered contemporaneous documents to show he memorialized Warner’s exact words.
“Waldman couldn’t believe a U.S. senator and the FBI chief were sending a different signal, so he went back to Laufman, who assured him the negotiations were still on. “What Laufman said to me after he heard I was told to ‘stand down’ by Warner and Comey was, ‘That’s bullshit. You are not standing down and neither am I,’” Waldman recalled.
Laufman eventually resigned his position and Assange was never granted immunity for his cooperation.
I think we can all figure out why at this point. The fix was in. And, the fix continues to be in.
Don’t delude yourself. Special Counsel Robert Mueller isn’t learning this at the same time we are. So ask yourself, why is he conducting no-knock raids with guns drawn against Trump associates absent any concrete evidence, when Comey made zero effort to secure either the DNC server or the HRC server despite overwhelming more reasons to do so?
If people want to believe that President Trump is ignorant of these events they do so foolishly. Trump knew it when he fired Comey.
Unlike Obama who always claimed he learned of wrongdoing from the media, it works the other way around.
This is likely to start unravelling very quickly from here. And, it’s not likely President Trump is going to let these criminals walk freely.