Elder Patriot – The rabid dog attempt to paint Donald Trump a tool of the Russian government was begun absent a charging predicate and has failed to tie the president to Russia in even the most rudimentary way.
Why did the entire intelligence apparatus target Donald Trump? Because of his campaign promise to “drain the swamp” that would necessarily expose how our elected officials sold the interests of the American people to foreign entities.
Most notable, but by no means exclusively, was China. Whether by deliberate malfeasance, legislative initiative, or executive decision China fed on America’s secrets and on our economy while those we elected to protect our interests fed on Chinese money.
While the Clintons – both Bill and Hillary – were at the forefront of these unholy exchanges, there’s plenty of evidence that virtually every Democrat and a significant number of Republicans gave at least passive approval to what can only be considered the great American con.
And the media, except for rare instances, covered everyone’s tracks.
David Horowitz chronicled the Clintons’ treason in The Black Book of the American Left Volume 7: The Left in Power: Clinton to Obama:
The Clinton “administration’s voluntary release of all the secrets of America’s nuclear tests, combined with the systematic theft of the secrets that were left as a result of its lax security controls, effectively wiped out America’s technological edge.”
“One of the key technological breaks China received, without having to spy to get it, was the deliverance of supercomputers once banned from export for security reasons.”
“Supercomputers underpin the technology of nuclear and missile warfare, and not only for firing and controlling the missiles. A supercomputer can simulate a nuclear test and is thus crucial to the development of nuclear warheads. But, according to a Washington Post editorial: ‘In the first three quarters of 1998 nine times as many [supercomputers] were exported [to China] as during the previous seven years.’”
“This transfer was authorized three years after the spy thefts were detected. What rationale—besides stupidity, greed, or some other equally indefensible motive—could justify this? What responsible president or administration official, at any relevant level in any government, would allow the massive transfer of national-security assets like these to a dictatorship they knew had stolen their country’s most highly guarded military secrets?”
Matthew Vadum, writing for the Capital Research Center, Matthew Vadum explained the unholy alliance that saw Bill Clinton exchange our most significant national security advancements for his personal financial benefit:
“As president, Bill Clinton essentially wiped out any strategic advantage the U.S. had by selling advanced U.S. missile technology to our enemy, the People’s Republic of China.”
“Unlike the administrations that preceded it, the Clinton administration accepted millions of dollars from the military and intelligence services of at least one hostile foreign power. All of this was done in exchange for illegal campaign contributions from a massive totalitarian country determined to eclipse the U.S. as a world superpower.”
“President Clinton also lifted security controls, allowing thieves to access other vital military technologies, while disarming his own side and opposing needed defenses.”
According to the New York Times, the transfer of American technology extended to virtually every aspect enabling China’s “communications” satellites program.
Making this all the more suspicious was Clinton’s decision followed “by less than a week the release of a report by the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, which concluded that lax monitoring of the launching of American-made satellites aboard Chinese rockets had enhanced the accuracy of China’s ballistic missile arsenal.”
In June of this year, the leftist publication The Atlantic published a piece under the headline: Normalizing Trade Relations With China Was a Mistake:
In 2000, Congress made the fateful decision to extend “permanent normal trade relations,” or PNTR, to China. As the economists Justin Pierce and Peter Schott have argued, the permanence of PNTR status made an enormous difference: Without PNTR, there was always a danger that China’s favorable access to the U.S. market would be revoked, which in turn deterred U.S. firms from increasing their reliance on Chinese suppliers. With PNTR in hand, the floodgates of investment were opened, and U.S. multinationals worked hand in glove with Beijing to create new China-centric supply chains. The age of “Chimerica” had begun.
This story was clearly written as cover for the Clintons’ corruption. The Clintons don’t make mistakes. When they do, people die. It was a straight quid pro quo.
The economic growth of China that ensued, concurrent with the decline of American manufacturing, resulted in massive year-over-year trade deficits that transferred trillions of dollars in worth to China and funded the growth of its military.
This was likely intended to allow China to sidestep the one thing that Ronald Reagan used to end Soviet hegemony – our economic superiority.
The problem with making a deal with the devil is that forever after the devil owns you. And that was the case with Hillary Clinton.
The Daily Caller is now reporting that a Chinese-owned company operating in the Washington, D.C., area hacked Hillary Clinton’s private server throughout her term as secretary of state and that the Chinese government was actually obtaining Hillary Clinton’s emails in real time!
It is extremely likely that the Chinese government learned of, killed, and imprisoned as many as 20 CIA assets as a result of the information gleaned from her emails.
Where was the FBI and/or CIA?
Congressman Louie Gohmert posted a statement to his official website contesting the claim that no evidence was found regarding a breach of Clinton’s private, unsecure server that was a summation of this exchange between Gohmert and fired FBI agent Peter Strzok who ignored her alliance with China:
Gohmert: You said earlier in this hearing you were concerned about a hostile foreign power affecting the election. Do you recall the Intelligence Community Inspector General Chuck McCullough having an investigation into an anomaly found on Hillary Clinton’s emails?
Strzok: I do not.
Gohmert: Let me refresh your recollection. The Intelligence Community Inspector General Chuck McCullough sent his investigator Frank Rucker along with an IGIC attorney Janette McMillan to brief you and Dean Chapelle and two other FBI personnel that I won’t name at this time, about an anomaly they had found on Hillary Clinton’s emails that were going to and from the private unauthorized server that you were supposed to be investigating. Now do you remember it?
Strzok: I remember meeting Mr. Rucker on either one or two occasions. I do not remember the specific content or discussions.
Gohmert: Well, I’ll help you with that too, then. Mr. Rucker reported to those of you, the four of you there, in the presence of the ICIG attorney, that they had found this anomaly on Hillary Clinton’s emails going through her private server, and when they had done the forensic analysis, they found that her emails, every single one except for four, over 30,000 of them, were going to an address that was not on the distribution list. It was a compartmentalized bit of information that was sending it to an unauthorized source. Do you recall that?
Strzok: Sir, I don’t.
Gohmert: He went on the explain it. And you didn’t say anything, you thanked him, you shook his hand. The problem is it was going to an unauthorized source that was a foreign entity unrelated to Russia and from what you’ve said here, you did nothing more than nod and shake the man’s hand when you didn’t seem to be all that concerned about our national integrity of our election when it was involving Hillary Clinton.
So the forensic examination was done by the ICIG — and they can document that — but you were given that information and you did nothing with it. And one of the things I found most egregious with Mr. Horowitz’s testimony, and — by the way. Horowitz got a call four times from someone wanting to brief him about this, leaving messages, and he never returned the call.
In light of the Clintons’ decades long association with China, that might qualify anyone else (certainly Donald Trump) as a foreign agent, here’s a question that needs to be answered: Did Hillary Clinton deliberately provide China with access to that server?
Whether Hillary did so because she was being paid to do so, or because she was being blackmailed, is immaterial.
That Congress didn’t rise up to stop the Clintons 20-plus years of “mistakes”makes them complicit and should disqualify them from office.
The fact that Senator Dianne Feinstein, who sits on the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, employed a Chinese spy for 20 years and hasn’t been impeached is troubling.
What if Donald Trump was found to have a Russian spy in his midst even for a single round of golf?
Cold anger. Feel it. Live it.