Party of Anarchy: Dem Protesters Paid

Elder Patriot -Brian and Ed Krassenstein are notorious online anti-Trump trolls backed by an army of 540,000 Twitter followers.  

Here is Brian admitting, on hidden camera, that he is paid for his disruptive activism.

“Of course there are higher ups that are paying us. They want us to help sow the division and to take over Trump’s Twitter feed. When [Trump] makes a post they want our tweets to be up there.”

H/T Infowars

Considering the level of civil disobedience that has accompanied many leftist demonstrations, including property destruction and assault, where that money comes from, and who directs its use, is important.

Consider these two variables that, taken together, casts shade on the hierarchy of the Democratic Party.

First, it has already been admitted that Democrats coordinated with protesters to turn the hearings for Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh into a disgraceful exhibition that demeaned the once austere governing process.  

Two hundred times left wing protesters disrupted the questioning of Brett Kavanaugh, but only when Republican Senators had the floor.


Sen. Dick Durbin (D-IL) admitted Tuesday in the Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on the nomination of Judge Brett Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court that he and other Democrats participated in a conference call on how to disrupt the hearings.

Durbin was responding to a question by Sen. Thom Tillis (R-NC), who cited an NBC News tweet from earlier in the morning that reported that Senate Democrats had planned over the Labor Day weekend to use protests and interruptions.

This proves at least a predicate for Democratic Party coordination with protesters in order to advance their radical agenda.  We are likely to see this again, only ten times over, in the lead up and aftermath of the Kavanaugh vote.

Second, consider that Dianne Feinstein, the ranking Democrat on the Senate Judiciary Committee, had knowledge of Christine Blasey-Ford’s allegation against Brett Kavanaugh and sat on it.  

The fact that she didn’t ask the FBI to investigate Dr. Ford’s allegations when their findings could’ve been submitted and considered during the now concluded hearings raises the second flag.  It’s a virtual certainty that Feinstein doesn’t find Dr. Ford to be credible so she saved bringing the letter forward when maximum political benefit might be achieved.

Having reviewed the credibility of Dr. Ford’s claim and not trusting that her testimony would convince anyone, Feinstein’s strategy turned to delaying the release of Dr. Ford’s letter at least until considering it would make it impossible for Kavanaugh to join the new court when the October 1st session begins.

Schumer and Feinstein have already achieved that goal.  Now, with Dr. Ford staring at a potential perjury charge, it’s likely that she’ll  be a no-show for Thursday’s hearing.

In her place will be protests, property damage, and violence.  Democrat kabuki theater that has become the trademark of the Schumer-Pelosi left.  

There can be no plausible deniability by Democrat leadership that these are “organic” protests.  According to multiple sources (Dan Bongino is one,) the highly coordinated efforts are heavily funded and organized by a central management team.

If we know this then you can be sure the FBI and local law enforcement agencies know this as well.  Where do you think we got this information from?

Which means the leadership of the Democratic Party has been approached to ask the protesters to tone it down and to  behave within the law.

Have you heard a single Democrat ask for temperance?  And, you’re not likely to until significant damage has been done.  The only possible explanation can be that Democrat leadership believes irrational violence and property damage will fire up their base.

The Democrat base really isn’t interested in fundamental fairness.  Nor are Senate Democrats who have turned the confirmation process upside down demanding that Dr. Ford believed and that Judge Kavanaugh be burdened with proving his innocence.

These elected lawmakers have turned the presumption of innocence on its head.  They swore to uphold the Constitution and now, for strictly partisan political purposes they cast aside 240 years of established legal process.

Their hypocrisy is brazen:

Is this who we want to be?