Obama-Era Intel Official Pleads Guilty to Spying for China – What is it With High-Level Democrats and Their Fealty to China?

Elder Patriot | Evidence of Barack Hussein Obama’s role as the Manchurian president, installed to diminish the standing of the United States around the world and to convince Americans to accept their lessened position, is becoming clearer.

Let’s examine that evidence.

Yesterday, the Department of Justice announced that Ron Rockwell Hansen, a Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) officer, pleaded guilty to attempted espionage with China in 2014:

The documents Hansen received were classified. The information in the documents related to the national defense of the United States in that it related to United States military readiness in a particular region and was closely held by the United States government.

Hansen pleaded guilty to one count of attempting to gather or deliver national defense information to aid a foreign government.  The plea agreement calls for an agreed-upon sentence of 15 years.

By itself, the arrest of Hansen is unremarkable.  Spying goes on… everywhere. But, this is just the latest instance of just how vulnerable the United States was allowed to become at the hands of the Chinese menace.

More important, the proof of China’s spying and meddling on behalf of, and with the assistance of, high-ranking Democrats is frightening.

Mid-year 2018, Luke Rosiak of the Daily Caller broke the story that Russell Lowe, who served as Dianne Feinstein’s (D-CA) office manager for 20 years was a Chinese spy.  Feinstein was the ranking member on the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence for some of that time.

That made her a member of the Gang of Eight and privy to the highest level intelligence.

As office manager Lowe had access to virtually all intelligence that Feinstein had access to.  Lowe also had access to high-level foreign officials from his position.

Rosiak appeared with Lou Dobbs to explain:

Then there’s the role that our tech giants, long believed to be the ultimate front doors to

surveillance and public influence programs that originated from the work of the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA), played in raising Democrats to positions of power.

Is Facebook the front door for the massive database the NSA maintains on every American?  There’s at least enough evidence to demand an investigation, but few in Congress, save Ted Cruz (R-TX) and some Republicans (members of the Freedom Caucus), seem interested.

Facebook has been using its massive power to influence voters since it first helped Barack Obama – the Manchurian president – get elected.

Carol Davidsen was Obama’s director for media analytics.

Aside from bringing its outsized powers for moving the electoral needle there should be major national security concern over the lengths Facebook’s Mark Zuckerberg has been willing to go to in order to please the Chinese government.  It is astonishing in its betrayal of fundamental American tenets.

The New York Times:\

“Zuckerberg has cultivated relationships with China’s leaders, including President Xi Jinping. He has paid multiple visits to the country to meet its top Internet executives. He has made an effort to learn Mandarin.

“Inside Facebook, the work to enter China runs far deeper.”

“The social network has quietly developed software to suppress posts from appearing in people’s news feeds in specific geographic areas, according to three current and former Facebook employees, who asked for anonymity because the tool is confidential. The feature was created to help Facebook get into China, a market where the social network has been blocked, these people said. Mr. Zuckerberg has supported and defended the effort, the people added.”

Why have Democrats defended, or at least declined to hold Facebook accountable?

Facebook has applied the same form of censorship here in the United States to conservative pages like the one they’re allowing to read, despite our having invested heavily in their platform.

Again, Democrats refuse to acknowledge Facebook’s unique political power and how they wield it for the advantage of … Democrats.

Then there’s Google the massive search engine that ran candidate Obama’s online efforts during the lead up to the 2008 election.  Despite the obvious implications, Google has never been forced to explain putting its thumb on the electoral scale.

Now Google finds itself in the position of having to explain why it is refusing to work with the U.S. military at the same time it is working to help the Chinese military.

Obama’s relationship with both companies has been well documented.  As is their hatred of Donald Trump.

Just as undeniable is the power to influence our politics that both companies hold over determining the outcome of elections.

Researcher Robert Epstein explained, “Google, Inc., has amassed far more power to control elections—indeed, to control a wide variety of opinions and beliefs—than any company in history has ever had. Google’s search algorithm can easily shift the voting preferences of undecided voters by 20 percent or more—up to 80 percent in some demographic groups—with virtually no one knowing they are being manipulated.”

Facebook has the ability to exert as much influence over our elections as Google has.

Then there was the economic and trade policies that Obama allowed to exfiltrate hundreds of billions of dollars from the U.S. economy annually.

Coupled with China’s forced transfer of technology, currency manipulation, and IP theft, China’s economy grew more than 143% during the Obama years.  Compare that to the 16% the U.S. economy grew over the same period.

Now recall how we were conditioned by Obama’s corporate allies to accept this new normal:

Add all of this together and you have President Obama overseeing the transfer of U.S. power to China.

Then there’s the undeniable fact that the UniParty led by the unanimous support of Democrats, has used everything at their disposal to oppose and block President Trump’s efforts to reign in China’s attempts at global hegemony.

All of this begs one final question; why are we investigating President Trump when the evidence is overwhelming that it’s Trump’s accusers who are the ones who are guilty of working for the benefit of a foreign government?