Yesterday, while questioning President Trump’s nominee to become the next Director of ICE, California Senator Kamala Harris revealed how Democrats have found success getting their candidates elected and thereby getting their agenda passed.
Democrat Senator Kamala Harris compares ICE to the KKK and appears to suggest that they are a terrorist group during a Senate hearing to consider the nomination of Ronald Vitello to be the director of ICE.
51% of ICE agents were Hispanic or Latino at the end of fiscal year 2016. pic.twitter.com/3coo3hljET
— Ryan Saavedra (@RealSaavedra) November 15, 2018
“Are you aware of the perception of many about how the power and the discretion at ICE is being used to enforce the laws and do you see any parallels [with the KKK]? she asked.
“I do not see any parallels,” Vitiello fired-back. “That puts ICE in the same category as the KKK.”
“Are you aware that there is a perception that ICE is administering its power in a way that is causing fear and intimidation, particularly among immigrants and specifically among immigrants coming from Mexico and Central America?” pressed Harris.
PERCEPTION. Backed by rulings from liberal judges and armed with a 1982 consent decree that prevented Republicans’ from participating in identifying voter fraud, Democrats, in concert with the mainstream media, have run roughshod over our electoral process while convincing voters they’re voters are the aggrieved ones.
The judge, Dickinson Debevoise, appointed by Jimmy Carter, later retired but decided he would continue to control the case. The decision requires the RNC – but not the DNC – to “refrain from undertaking any ballot security activities in polling places or election districts where the racial or ethnic composition of such districts is a factor in the decision to conduct, or the actual conduct of, such activities there and where a purpose or significant effect of such activities is to deter qualified voters from voting; and the conduct of such activities disproportionately in or directed toward districts that have a substantial proportion of racial or ethnic populations shall be considered relevant evidence of the existence of such a factor and purpose.”
The decree stayed in effect until it was finally lifted 34 years and nine presidential elections later, on October 31, 2016.
Remember, it was Russian strongman Joseph Stalin who said, ““I consider it completely unimportant who in the party will vote, or how; but what is extraordinarily important is this — who will count the votes, and how.”
In a 2012 article that was published by WND, Bob Unruh described how Democrats used and abused the court ordered advantage:
Voting machines suspiciously defaulting to Barack Obama? Buses loaded with strangers appearing at polling stations? Even ballots turning out 100 percent for one candidate in precinct reports?
In short, suspicions of vote fraud?
That’s too bad, because a race-based consent decree negotiated by Democrats against the Republican National Committee a generation ago still has tied the RNC’s hands, and GOP officials could be cited for contempt – or worse – if they try to make sure American elections are clean.
In case you’re wondering how that decree was agreed to by the Reagan RNC, 1982 as they are today, the GOP establishment was aligned against Reagan after he beat down establishment candidates Gerald Ford and George H.W. Bush.
Since that decree, Democrats and the media have assiduously created the perception that Republicans are bigots aligned against minorities while, absent oversight, they were free to engage in voter and election fraud.
When they did lose key elections, as they did in 2000, 2004, and then in 2016 – the last eight days after the consent decree had been lifted – after voters for Donald Trump had overwhelmed the fraudulent system, Democrats and the media worked to create the perception that the results were invalid.
Democrats had used that advantage with such success that we were told that a blue wall now existed making is impossible for Republicans to win the White House ever again.
The media’s role in creating this perception cannot be overstated. We were told that Trump’s massive rallies should be ignored because their polling showed far different results. In the end the polls were wrong.
That raises the question whether the polls were deliberately manipulated to push voters towards a particular candidate so as to match the expected results after accounting for the fraud?
Hillary Clinton’s campaign operatives couldn’t have been clearer in their emails about the need to create perception.
Emmett Tyrrell, writing for the Washington Times, recounts a history of Democrats’ role in corrupting elections to feed their lust for power that has produced a party “led by septuagenarians who are exhausted and feckless, and they are about to be replaced by greenhorns who are self-proclaimed Socialists. That is to say, the septuagenarians are about to be replaced by Machiavels whose politics are at best lifted from the European left or at worst lifted from Venezuelans, some of whom have to stand in line for toilet paper.”
With uninspired leaders offering voters an entirely un-American agenda, Democrats have been forced into a two-pronged strategy to maintain power.
The first has been a massive movement to personally destroy Donald Trump, his family, and associates.
The second is voter and election fraud.
Neither would be possible without the full onslaught by the mainstream media selling that perception.
Accepting defeat is quite incomprehensible to the left. That is why every contested presidential election of the modern era — in fact, every contested presidential election in any era — has been contested by the left, not the right. Interestingly, in recent years, as the left’s power dwindles, the number of contested elections has increased and grown more rancorous.
That brings us to the undeniably fraudulent actions by Democrats Supervisors of Elections in Broward and Palm Beach counties that only carry the hint of legitimacy because of mainstream media nurtured perception.
The fact is, with the 1982 consent decree now vacated, Republicans have every right to be granted full access to observing the process yet some Democratic S.O.E.’s still act as though they aren’t:
In the massive warehouse in #PalmBeach, republican watchers are relegated to one tiny corner of the entire warehouse. When my husband @johnloudon asked SOE why no watchers r allowed back for #ChainOfCustody, she said she’d throw all R’s out if he didn’t stop asking questions.
— Dr. Gina (@RealDrGina) November 14, 2018
#DrainTheSwamp – @RepMattGaetz: State statutes, constitutional Florida were violated in Palm Beach & Broward County. I’m concerned that Dimms might think they’ll be able to steal an election through lawsuits when they can’t win with the voters. #MAGA #TrumpTrain #Dobbs pic.twitter.com/0JLzNNIznu
— Lou Dobbs (@LouDobbs) November 15, 2018
Worse, evidence has now surfaced, outlined by Ana Ceballos of NaplesNews.com that the problems in Broward and Palm Beach county were planned and orchestrated by the Florida’s Democratic Party in advance of the vote.
To all those saying “fraud” is a “conspiracy theory” ? https://t.co/YrxKpSWYH1
— Matt Gaetz (@mattgaetz) November 16, 2018
Unfortunately, Democrats have erected firewalls everywhere. An Obama appointed Chief Judge, Mark Walker ignored existing law put in place to protect against voter fraud and ruled to allow the fraudulent ballots to be counted.
No evidence of fraud in #FloridaElection?
Dems got voters to use altered forms to fix & submit as many mail ballots as possible after FL deadline in hopes that a judge would later order state to count them.
Today that’s exactly what a federal judge did. https://t.co/MC4Tlvy9gi
— Marco Rubio (@marcorubio) November 15, 2018
It’s highly unlikely that Democrat’s efforts to illegally affect the outcome of elections is isolated to two counties in Florida. We’ve chronicled their efforts in more than seven dozen columns that covered dozens of states and every conceivable scheme.
And this one that asks:
As we said from the top, it’s all about perception.