Judicial Watch Cites Overwhelming Evidence In Filing Ethics Complaint Against U.S. Representative Ilhan Omar

Judicial Watch has filed an ethics complaint with the Chairman of the U.S. House of Representatives Office of Congressional Ethics, David Skaggs, demanding an investigation of U.S. Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-MN).

In the complaint, Judicial Watch claims:

Substantial, compelling and, to date, unrefuted evidence has been uncovered that Rep. Ilhan Omar may have committed the following crimes in violation of both federal law and Minnesota state law: perjury, immigration fraud, marriage fraud, state and federal tax fraud, and federal student loan fraud.

Such violations would also breach the Code of Ethics for Government Service, to which all federal officeholders are subject, “Any person in Government service should uphold the Constitution, laws, and legal regulations of the United States and all governments therein and never be a party to their evasion.”) Rep. Omar actions in this suspected immigration fraud, marriage fraud, perjurious statements on her Minnesota divorce filings, and falsifications on her tax returns, merit your immediate investigation.

The complaint goes on to cite the three-year-long investigation of journalists David Steinberg, Preya Samsundar and Scott Johnson.  

JW cites as evidence, “information gathered from public records, social media postings, genealogy databases, computer forensic analysis, unaltered digital photographs, discussions between the investigative reporters and the subjects of the investigation themselves, and information supplied by confidential sources within the Somali-American community.”

From that evidence, Judicial Watch alleges:

Rep. Ilhan Abdullahi Omar, a citizen of the United States, married her biological brother, Ahmed Nur Said Elmi, a citizen of the United Kingdom, in 2009, presumably as part of an immigration fraud scheme. 

The couple legally divorced in 2017. 

In the course of that divorce, Ms. Omar submitted an “Application for an Order for Service by Alternate Means” to the State of Minnesota on August 2, 2017 and claimed, among other things, that she had had no contact with Ahmed Nur Said Elmi after June 2011. She also claimed that she did not know where to find him. 

The evidence developed by Mr. Steinberg and his colleagues demonstrates with a high degree of certainty that Ms. Omar not only had contact with Mr. Elmi, but actually met up with him in London in 2015, which is supported by photographic evidence. 

Ilhan Omar and Ahmen Nur Said Elmi together in London.

Ms. Omar signed the “Application for an Order for Service by Alternate Means” under penalty of perjury. The very document that Ilham Omar signed on August 2, 2017 bears the following notation directly above her signature: “I declare under penalty of perjury that everything I have stated in this document is true and correct. Minn. Stat. § 358.116.”

But Omar’s perjury on the divorce filing is only a small part of her criminal behavior.

There’s probable cause to investigate Rep. Omar for 8 instances of perjury, immigration & marriage fraud, federal tax fraud, student loan fraud, even bigamy: “Perhaps the most extensive spree of illegal misconduct committed by a House member in American history.”

Prior to the 2018 election of Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-MN), David Steinberg doggedly pursued evidence that Ilhan Omar entered had into a sham marriage with her brother in 2009.

Those articles can be accessed here (August 13, 2018), here (October 23, 2018), here (October 30, 2018), and here (November 5, 2018).  

Despite the evidence, the Democrat Propagandist Media ignored the story.

And now, sources have expressed fear regarding published video and photo evidence confirming threats from Omar’s campaign team

Why are Democrats intent on turning us into a third world country?

The entire thread can be viewed here.