Fair Question: Is Ruth Bader Ginsburg Still Sufficiently Cognitive to Hold a Seat on the Supreme Court?

Elder Patriot – WASHINGTON (AP) — Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg is missing arguments for the first time in more than 25 years as she recuperates from cancer surgery last month, the Supreme Court said.

Ginsburg was not on the bench as the court met Monday to hear arguments. It was not clear when she would return to the court, which will hear more cases Tuesday and Wednesday, and again next week.

Ginsburg’s absence follows by four months this interview (below) at an event hosted by the National Asian Pacific American Bar Association.  At that time, the Supreme Court Justice appeared to be marginally coherent:

Fast forward four months and consider that the left-wing icon has suffered three broken ribs and survived surgery for lung cancer.  Anyone who has dealt with aging parents can tell you, these are the types of medical events that often lead to an immediate sharp mental decline.

Given Justice Ginsburg’s age (85) and the importance of the position she holds, it’s legitimate to question whether she is still capable of performing to the rigorous intellectual standard required of Supreme Court Justices.

This may be an uncomfortable question for many (it is for me) but there is a government to run and the importance of the High Court has become more important in recent years.

The left obviously realizes the damage that a Trump-appointed replacement would do to what remains of their hold over the High Court.  This raises the question, are there left-wing forces that are essentially working a real life version of Weekend at Bernie’s?

Before dismissing just how far these radicals would go to maintain power consider the gang rape allegations they leveled against Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh.  

This wasn’t the construct of one or two fringe radical Democrats.  It was an unanimous narrative of the now hard-left party and fully supported by the mainstream propaganda media.  They literally called in every chip from every group.

It was reported at the time that high-ranking Democrats coordinated with protesters to turn the hearings for Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh into a disgraceful sideshow intended to sway Democrat voters but that wound up demeaning the once austere governing process in the process.  

Kavanaugh’s accusers eventually admitted they lied, but only after he had been confirmed.

The whole sordid extended confirmation hearing appeared to be orchestrated in collaboration with the same anti-Trump Deep Staters inside the CIA, DOJ, FBI and Team Clinton that organized and ran “spygate.”

Having witnessed and studied the entirety of the Kavanaugh resistance movement, it became evident that nothing was off-limits for the now radicalized Democrat/Marxists in their quest to maintain the liberal bent of the courts.

Even lower courts that were infested with hard left ideological judges were weaponized to stall the Trump agenda.  These judges used their power to deny immediate implementation of Trump’s agenda even when there was little doubt that their decisions would be overturned by a higher court.

It was all about buying time while multiple other tracks were working to unseat President Trump.

The importance of the seat Ginsburg occupies on the Court is founded in two separate narratives.  Rank and file Democrats are prepared to literally destroy anyone who might be an ideological threat to their sacrament, abortion.  

Party apparatchiks, on the other hand, are desperate to block President Trump’s effort to expose the rampant corruption that the Obama administration seeded throughout our government – but especially in weaponizing the CIA-DOJ-FBI against political opponents – because the release of that information will provide evidence of top Democrats’ complicity in the treasonous scheme.

Perhaps a video of Justice Ginsburg conversing with her doctors, and a letter from those doctors attesting to her cognitive abilities could silence these questions.  

After all, haven’t Democrat/Marxists been trying to invoke the Twenty-Fifth Amendment to remove President Trump based on imaginary charges of diminished intellectual capacity?