Dem’s Using DARPA Information Warfare Tool to Target Pro-Trump Accounts

(Fox News) An anti-Trump Democratic-aligned political action committee advised by retired Army Gen. Stanley McChrystal is planning to deploy an information warfare tool that received initial funding from DARPA, the Pentagon’s secretive research arm — transforming technology originally envisioned as a way to fight ISIS propaganda into a campaign platform to benefit Joe Biden.

Yes, McChrystal’s efforts would benefit Biden… if he actually gains his party’s nomination… but, more importantly it will benefit China.  

When did the product of research by the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency become the province of a political party? 

Consider this…  DARPA began a project named LifeLog to compile a massive electronic database of every activity and relationship a person engages in. This was to include credit card purchases, web sites visited, the content of telephone calls and emails sent and received, scans of faxes and postal mail sent and received, instant messages sent and received, books and magazines read, television and radio selections, physical location recorded via wearable GPS sensors, biomedical data captured through wearable sensors, etc. 

The high level goal of this data logging was to identify “preferences, plans, goals, and other markers of intentionality.”

That program sounds an awful lot like Facebook and/or the NSA

That DARPA program was canceled in 2004 following the outcry from civil libertarians over privacy rights.

Coincidentally, a boy genius, two years removed from high school, sitting in his dorm room at Harvard – precisely at the same time the plug is pulled on LifeLog – conceived this incredibly sophisticated data collection network and the way to monetize it when he created Facebook.

Now recall that Facebook stood aside while Obama’s campaign team was “sucking out the whole social graph” to help him win reelection…

Before dismissing this as normal political gamesmanship be aware that Federal Election Commission regulations consider providing material support given to a candidate as an “in kind contribution” and therefore it must be reported as such on the candidates finance filing.  It wasn’t.

As you read what comes next recall this from November 23rd, 2016:

Mark Zuckerberg’s net worth is estimated to be in excess of $50 Billion dollars.  Apparently that’s not enough money to satisfy the Chairman and CEO of Facebook.

According to the New York Times, in his effort to grow Facebook Mr. Zuckerberg “has cultivated relationships with China’s leaders, including President Xi Jinping. He has paid multiple visits to the country to meet its top Internet executives. He has made an effort to learn Mandarin.

“Inside Facebook, the work to enter China runs far deeper.”

Zuckerberg knows that to gain access for his social media network to China’s 1.1 billion people he’ll need to play by China’s rules.  That means accepting China’s Internet censorship rules.

In fact, the Times reports that “The social network has quietly developed software to suppress posts from appearing in people’s news feeds in specific geographic areas, according to three current and former Facebook employees, who asked for anonymity because the tool is confidential. The feature was created to help Facebook get into China, a market where the social network has been blocked, these people said. Mr. Zuckerberg has supported and defended the effort, the people added.”

Following the 2016 election, outgoing Manchurian President Obama summoned Zuckerberg to Peru where he was told to shut down pro-Trump news reporting on Facebook.

Karin McQuillan writing for the American Thinker explains what transpired at the Peru meeting:

 

Until Obama’s intervention, Facebook corporate policy was rock solid.  Zuckerberg’s entire business model was that Facebook is a platform, not a content provider.  The company has always claimed they have no responsibility for content. The Jewish Press begged Zuckerberg to block Islamic Facebook pages teaching how to make ‘lone wolf’ knife attacks fatal.   Zuckerberg refused.  Not his problem.”

Immediately after their November 19th 2016 meeting in Lima Facebook began censoring pro-Trump and conservative websites under a number of premises including labeling them fake news or violating their terms of service for civility.  From that point forward engagement dropped precipitously for sites questioning the wisdom of the Globalists & their movement.

Even statistically-based news reporting could not get through Facebook’s censorship.  If it challenged the one-world movement, or the wisdom of legislation promoted by Washington’s Globalist OneParty, it was labeled Fake News and blocked from users’ news feeds.  In some cases, if the facts were irrefutable, Facebook’s algorithms were employed to diminish public views.

Zuckerberg knows that to gain access for his social media network to China’s 1.1 billion people he’ll need to play by China’s rules.  That means accepting China’s Internet censorship rules.

Who benefits from these efforts?  Certainly not Americans who rely on a free and open press in our system of self-governance.

We live in the information age.  Protecting that information is tantamount to protecting our military secrets.

Yet China steals our intellectual property and engages in forced technology transfer, and Democrats, and their co-conspirators inside the Deep State defend them and make multiple attempts to remove the president who wants to put an end to that information theft.

They think you’re stupid…