Elder Patriot – While the argument continues to rage whether Jeffrey Epstein was responsible for his own death, or not, the most important aspect of his death remains inarguable; the government failed to protect the life of perhaps the most important witness in its custody.
That raises our concern that Julian Assange, the man literally at the epicenter of the government’s Russiagate, is in similar danger.
Assange is still awaiting extradition to the United States after being removed from the Ecuadorian embassy in London last April and remanded to Belmarsh prison. According to Business Insider, Belmarsh is one of the UK’s most notorious prisons.
Belmarsh houses many of Britain’s most dangerous criminals, including a number of Islamic terrorists. BI notes that violence at Belmarsh has been increasing.
Why is he still there?
Except for the fact that Belmarsh offers a convenient place for Assange to be silenced, perhaps permanently, Assange’s prolonged detention there doesn’t pass the smell test.
Consider that Assange’s silence may very well have become necessary to contain the damage arising from, both the FBI and special counsel Robert Mueller’s attempted coup against President Trump.
By now it’s become clear to everyone, except the most brainwashed leftists, that the initial FBI investigation wasn’t based on any legitimate actionable intelligence but rather that President Trump, and those around him, were the victims of a setup.
The conspirators who attempted the takedown of President Trump explained the WikiLeaks/Assange role was as a pass-through used by the Russians to disseminate information into the American consciousness.
But, neither the FBI nor the special counsel deemed Assange’s testimony worth hearing.
We always found it disturbing that Robert Mueller made a big show of indicting Russian troll farms that would never see the inside of a courtroom while at the same time never interviewing Julian Assange, who he claimed received the hacked emails Wikileaks released from Russia. Odd.
For a man who spent 22 months overturning every rock looking for a trace of evidence implicating Russia’s role in allegedly efforting to help Donald Trump’s election efforts, Mueller’s decision not to extradite Assange smacks of coverup.
Why was Mueller so obviously avoiding interviewing a witness who could corroborate the important assumptions that served as the foundation on which Mueller was basing his investigation?
That question gains increased significance with the public declarations of people who knew Assange.
Seth Rich? He’s the DNC staffer who’s murder remains unsolved more than two years after his body was found on a Washington DC street.
Rich is alleged to have downloaded the contents of the “hacked” DNC server onto a thumb drive and was scheduled to meet with the FBI the following morning.
Rich, potentially held the answer to this troublesome fact:
“…computer scientists and experts have determined that the breach of security could not have been perpetrated from outside individuals, particularly international hackers, because of the high-data transfer rates used during the incident.
“The breach occurred on July 5th at approximately 6:45 PM, with the stolen data being transferred at a rate of 22.7 megabytes per second; a download speed that is “simply unobtainable” using the Internet, particularly overseas.
“The forensics team now believes the emails were taken from someone inside the DNC, or an individual with access to facilities that house the Party’s email servers, using a thumb-drive or other portable device capable of high-speed data transfers.
“A speed of 22.7 megabytes is simply unattainable, especially if we are talking about a transoceanic data transfer,” said one expert. “Based on the data we now have, what we’ve been calling a hack is impossible.”
“The new data raises serious questions over who stole the DNC emails and leaked them to the press, and if the Democratic Party intentionally tried to spin the breach as “Russian interference.”
Assange may be the last remaining person that can provide first-hand corroboration regarding Seth Rich as WikiLeaks source.
Assange has repeatedly said:
“We can say, and we have said repeatedly over the last two months, that our source is not the Russian government, and it is not a state party.”
It seems no one wants to risk the exculpatory testimony of the people who were involved with Seth Rich, becoming public.
If Rich was the source, that threatens to destroy the predicate behind the contrived Russian hacking narrative developed to remove President Trump.
It would also incriminate the dirty investigators and others that were involved – notably former FBI Director James Comey and special counsel Robert Mueller as well as potentially, the DNC, the Clinton campaign team, Debbie Wasserman Schultz, etc.
We asked again, why hasn’t Assange been questioned?
At the very least, Julian Assange deserves his day in court, if only to have the opportunity to prove his innocence .
Only mob bosses and corrupt government tyrants, believe that silence is golden… and necessary.