ELDER PATRIOT – When Stephen Bannon was named CEO of the Trump campaign the mainstream media went into a meltdown. The Hill summed up the fears of the entire Clinton propaganda machine with this headline, “Trumps recruitment of Bannon means war and everyone knows it.”
Their fears are based on Bannon’s intimate knowledge of all of the facts behind Peter Schweizer’s book, Clinton Cash. The book meticulously ties together foreign donations to the Clinton Foundation with Hillary Clinton’s favorable decisions on the donors’ behalf while she was Secretary of State.
The book, and the subsequent movie have been widely touted by Breitbart News that Bannon just took a leave of absence from running so that he could head up Donald Trump’s campaign.
It’s Bannon’s, and now expected to be Donald Trump’s willingness to hammer Hillary’s role in what amounts to the greatest corruption scheme in the world’s history save for the creation of the Federal Reserve and the World Bank that represents not only an existential threat to the Clinton campaign but to the entire lie that is the Globalist movement.
Mrs. Clinton’s role in all of this is so indefensible that earlier this week she sought to quell the public’s growing concerns and backtracked when she said the foundation would no longer accept foreign donations if she were to become president.
That raised the question, if it’s improper to accept that money as president why was it okay to accept that money while Secretary of State? When given the opportunity to explain the difference Mrs. Clinton’s campaign manager Robbie Mook had no answer:
The Washington Post has declared war on Donald Trump months ago but even they found themselves compelled to run a headline that screamed: “More than half of Clinton Foundation’s major donors would be barred under new rule.”
Then, Breitbart reported that, “The Huffington Post, one of the world’s most trafficked news sites, featured a headline on Sunday calling for the closure of the embattled Clinton Foundation. The left-wing outlet’s front page banner linked to a New York Times article, which highlights, among other things, that Bill and Hillary Clinton’s billion dollar nonprofit has “accepted tens of millions of dollars from countries that the State Department — before, during and after Mrs. Clinton’s time as secretary — criticized for their records on sex discrimination and other human-rights issues.”
The only thing that has been propping up Hillary Clinton has been the mainstream media’s collective and intentional refusal to report these revelations truthfully and in proportion to other less significant campaign facts such as where Donald Trump’s ties are manufactured.
If this signals Hillary is losing the free $2 billion in positive MSM reporting that she had expected to continue receiving until the election, her campaign is sunk.