Elder Patriot – After corrupt Senator Dianne Feinstein promised to reopen an investigation into newly seated Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh if the Democrats win back the Senate, South Carolina Republican Lindsey Graham made a promise of his own.
Graham told reporters if Republicans keep control of the Senate and he becomes chairman of the Judiciary Committee:
“I promise you this, we’re going to investigate who betrayed Dr. Ford. I’m going to find out why her lawyers did not tell her that the committee would have gone to California to interview her in private, so she didn’t have to go through this. That’s what I’m going to investigate.”
Today, government watchdog Judicial Watch released a statement that they had already file a complaint with the Board of Personal Responsibility against those lawyers:
(Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch announced today that it filed a complaint to the Board of Professional Responsibility of the District of Columbia Court of Appeals of Debra S. Katz, Lisa J. Banks, and Michael R. Bromwich for violating the rules of professional responsibility in their representation of Dr. Christine Blasey Ford before the U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee during the hearings on the nomination of the Honorable Brett Kavanaugh.
According to the Judicial Watch complaint, by not informing their client Dr. Ford that Sen. Chuck Grassley, Chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee offered in a letter to “fly female staff investigators to meet Dr. Ford… in California, or anywhere else, to obtain (her) testimony,” Katz, Banks, and Bromwich violated the following District of Columbia Rules of Professional Conduct:
Rule l.4(a) – A lawyer shall keep a client reasonably informed about the status of a matter and promptly comply with reasonable requests for information.
Rule 1.4(b) – A lawyer shall explain a matter to the extent reasonably necessary to permit the client to make informed decisions regarding the representation.
The deliberate deception of Ford by her attorneys Katz, Banks, and Bromwich became immediately evident by Ford’s response to a question from sex crimes prosecutor Rachel Mitchell.
Mitchell: Was it communicated to you by your counsel or someone else that the committee had asked to interview you, and that they offered to come out to California to do so?
Dr. Ford Attorney: I’m going to object, Mr. Chairman, to any call for privileged conversation between counsel and Dr. Ford.
Mitchell: Could you validate that the offer was made, without saying a word? Is it possible for that question to be answered without violating any counsel relationships?
Dr. Ford: Can I say something to you? Do you mind if I say something to you directly? I just appreciate that you did offer that. I wasn’t clear on what the offer was. If you were going to come out to see me, I would have happily hosted you and been happy to speak with you out there. I just did not – it was not clear to me that that was the case.
We discussed the possibility that this was going to turn ugly against the radical leftist attorneys representing Ford but this may only be the tip of the iceberg when it comes to who else played Ford in the construct of the Kavanaugh lynching.
It was Dianne Feinstein, the ranking member of the Judiciary Committee, who violated the ethics of the Senate by originally recommending Debra Katz to Ford and then sitting on Ford’s letter for 45 days.