Elder Patriot – This may change everything.
(The Daily Beast) “Is the Epstein case going to cause a problem [for confirmation hearings]?” Acosta had been asked. Acosta had explained, breezily, apparently, that back in the day he’d had just one meeting on the Epstein case. He’d cut the non-prosecution deal with one of Epstein’s attorneys because he had “been told” to back off, that Epstein was above his pay grade. “I was told Epstein ‘belonged to intelligence’ and to leave it alone,” he told his interviewers in the Trump transition, who evidently thought that was a sufficient answer and went ahead and hired Acosta. (The Labor Department had no comment when asked about this.)
“I was told Epstein ‘belonged to intelligence’ and to leave it alone” – Labor Secretary Nominee Alex Acosta
Judging by the high-profile politicians, many Democrats, that have already been outed, it’s no wonder that Epstein was given the ultimate slap on the wrist when he should’ve been serving the remainder of his unnatural life in prison.
If these high-level, but retired politicians were the ones thrown under the bus the mind races with who the others, yet to be named client’s of Epstein, might be.
Vicky Ward, who authored the piece for The Daily Beast, originally reported about Epstein for the 2003 Vanity Fair article.
According to Josh Marshall writing for Talking Points Memo:
“Ward had a detailed version of the underaged girls part of the story but Vanity Fair cut that from the 2003 story.”
Evidence has long pointed to a relationship of convenient disinformation dissemination between the CIA and The Washington Post and, between The New York Times and the FBI in my opinion. This makes me wonder if Vanity Fair also similarly “tied” to intelligence?
Consider the possibility that the plea deal, that then U.S. Attorney Alex Acosta agreed to with Epstein’s lawyers, gave a walk to “unnamed co-conspirators,” and you have to at least consider the possibility that this was another Deep State intelligence operation designed to control powerful politicians, businessmen and diplomats.
After living through the Deep State’s unrelenting assault on POTUS for the past three years, Epstein and his co-conspirators being protected because they supplied dirt on everyone in a position of power doesn’t seem far-fetched… it seems likely to me.
Assume the Daily Beast is right: the DOJ laid off Epstein because of his ties to intelligence
Now consider the 2007 plea deal. The US agreed to not charge "any potential co-conspirators"
Serious question – could the unnamed co-conspirators be intelligence? pic.twitter.com/y9mwFGO2ZM
— Techno Fog (@Techno_Fog) August 19, 2019
Some will argue that this a conspiracy theory. It may yet turn out to be but all investigators develop conspiracy theories before they prove one theory correct by tying all of the evidence together.
It’s past time to put everyone under oath in a series of public forums and let the chips fall where they may. It’s looking more and more likely that their intent is not to protect methods and assets, but their own criminal behavior.