WOW! CNN Op-Ed Admits Mueller Report Reveals That Obama’s NSA Director Told U.S. Cyber Security Team to “Stand Down” in Face of Russian Hackers

Elder Patriot – Where the f*ck is the mainstream media?  Why have they colluded to hide this story?  It should’ve been the headline of every major news outlet when it broke.  And, if not at that time, then immediately upon the release of the Mueller Report.

Instead the falsely accused, and continue accusing Attorney General William Barr of being Trump’s personal lawyer.

Editor’s Note: Scott Jennings, a CNN contributor, is a former special assistant to President George W. Bush and former campaign adviser to Sen. Mitch McConnell. He is a partner at RunSwitch Public Relations in Louisville, Kentucky. Follow him on Twitter @ScottJenningsKY. The opinions expressed in this commentary are his own. View more opinion articles on CNN.

(CNN)The partisan warfare over the Mueller report will rage, but one thing

cannot be denied: Former President Barack Obama looks just plain bad. On his watch, the Russians meddled in our democracy while his administration did nothing about it.

The Mueller report flatly states that Russia began interfering in American democracy in 2014. Over the next couple of years, the effort blossomed into a robust attempt to interfere in our 2016 presidential election. The Obama administration knew this was going on and yet did nothing. In 2016, Obama’s National Security Adviser Susan Rice told her staff to “stand down” and “knock it off” as they drew up plans to “strike back” against the Russians, according to an account from Michael Isikoff and David Corn in their book “Russian Roulette: The Inside Story of Putin’s War on America and the Election of Donald Trump”.

Why did Obama go soft on Russia? My opinion is that it was because he was singularly focused on the nuclear deal with Iran. Obama wanted Putin in the deal, and to stand up to him on election interference would have, in Obama’s estimation, upset that negotiation. This turned out to be a disastrous policy decision.

Whatever the detail were back then, and we did report them at the time, the bottom line, according the Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s 22-month long investigation is that neither Trump nor his campaign associates had anything to do with Russia.

And, Obama did.  Or, at least his National security Advisor Susan Rice did.

From Chuck Ross of the Daily Caller on June 20, 2018:

Former President Barack Obama’s cybersecurity czar confirmed Wednesday that former national security adviser Susan Rice told him to “stand down” in response to Russian cyber attacks during the 2016 presidential campaign.

Michael Daniel, whose official title was “cybersecurity coordinator,” confirmed the stand-down order during a Senate Select Committee on Intelligence hearing held to review the Obama and President Donald Trump’s administration’s’ policy response to Russian election interference.

The Huffington Post reported Rice’s “Stand Down” order even earlier… more than three months earlier on March 9th:

… One day in late August, national security adviser Susan Rice called Daniel into her office and demanded he cease and desist from working on the cyber options he was developing. “Don’t get ahead of us,” she warned him. The White House was not prepared to endorse any of these ideas. Daniel and his team in the White House cyber response group were given strict orders: Stand down. She told Daniel to “knock it off,” he recalled.

Still the story was ignored by the vast majority of the blue checkmarked media.

Jennings, who authored the CNN op-ed asked an important question that needs to be answered:

A legitimate question Republicans are asking is whether the potential “collusion” narrative was invented to cover up the Obama administration’s failures. Two years have been spent fomenting the idea that Russia only interfered because it had a willing, colluding partner: Trump. Now that Mueller has popped that balloon, we must ask why this collusion narrative was invented in the first place.

[…]

… the Mueller report makes it clear that the Russian interference failure was Obama’s alone. He was the commander-in-chief when all of this happened.

[…]

If you consider Russian election interference a crisis for our democracy, then you cannot read the Mueller report, adding it to the available public evidence, and conclude anything other than Barack Obama spectacularly failed America. Subsequent investigations of this matter should explore how and why Obama’s White House failed, and whether they invented the collusion narrative to cover up those failures.