Trump-Russia Collusion Gives Way to Emerging Evidence of Clinton-Obama-Ukraine-Russia Collusion

Elder Patriot| The first notion that must be dispelled is the media inspired characterization of Donald Trump as a shoot-from-the-hip dolt who runs off at the mouth without facts or justification.

President Trump is arguably the most well-informed person on the planet.  Nor is he stupid, unable to process unrelated data bits, or simply a beneficiary of his father’s money.

All of those narrative lines are critical to maintaining control over those Americans who are so vested in Hillary Clinton that they can’t wrap their head around the fact that Donald Trump never colluded with the Russians.

Adding to the emotional distress the emerging truth about the phony Trump-Russia collusion narrative these Trump haters are having so much difficulty accepting is that this also requires another – even more severe – blow to their belief system.

That requires them to accept the earth-shattering fact that Barack Obama ran the most corrupt administration in the history of our country.

If the weaponization of the intelligence agencies to take down a duly-elected president hasn’t driven these Kool-Aid drinkers off the progressive bandwagon then perhaps evidence of Clinton-Obama collusion with foreign entities might.

That possibility came to light yesterday when Ukraine’s top prosecutor, Yurii Lutsenko – the equivalent of Attorney General William Barr – told John Solomon that he has opened an investigation into whether his country’s law enforcement apparatus intentionally efforted to sway the election in favor of Hillary Clinton.

For a video of the interview click here.

Solomon wrote:

Ukraine Prosecutor General Yurii Lutsenko’s probe was prompted by a Ukrainian parliamentarian’s release of a tape recording purporting to quote a top law enforcement official as saying his agency leaked the Manafort financial records to help Clinton’s campaign.

The parliamentarian also secured a court ruling that the leak amounted to “an illegal intrusion into the American election campaign,” Lutsenko told me. Lutsenko said the tape recording is a serious enough allegation to warrant opening a probe, and one of his concerns is that the Ukrainian law enforcement agency involved had frequent contact with the Obama administration’s U.S. Embassy in Kiev at the time.  

Solomon then notes who was running Ukraine at the time:

Lutsenko, before becoming prosecutor general, was a major activist against Russia’s influence in his country during the tenure of Moscow-allied former President Viktor Yanukovych. He became chief prosecutor in 2016 as part of anti-corruption reforms instituted by current President Petro Poroshenko, an ally of the U.S. and Western countries.

It gets worse:

We know the FBI set up shop in the U.S. embassy in Kiev to assist its Ukraine–Manafort inquiry.

What that means is that the Obama appointed Ambassador to the Ukraine was involved with helping the FBI build a one-sided case, with the assistance of Russian puppet and then-Ukrainian President Viktor Yanukovych, against Paul Manafort while ignoring the Obama-administration’s efforts on behalf of Hillary Clinton.

Predictably, following Lutsenko’s announcement, the State Department, still staffed by Clintonistas, issued a statement declaring that it will no longer financially support Lutsenko’s office in its anti-corruption mission.

Consider that statement for just a minute.  Can we conclude that the Obama State Department was financially supporting the Ukrainian prosecutor while he was working under Russian-puppet Yanukovych to help Clinton by dirtying up Paul Manafort?

It was against this backdrop:

Donald Trump persevered and the United States thrived.

How could Trump have navigated this wholly corrupted government minefield if he hadn’t been briefed about which side of evil the players aligned against him were on?

Trump supporters elected the right man, the man they hoped for.  Smarter and tougher, by a good margin, than those aligned against him.

How many people would be able to comprehend the depth of the conspiracy against him, withstand their ceaseless attacks for more than two years, and formulate and carry out a strategy to expose them all?

Now the fun starts:

(Cue to :20)

Now listen to the way this works:

(1:35) “The media bought it hook, line and sinker.  The were fed phony information, they disseminated phony information…”

Understand this as you consider the nearly three-year-long media-driven narrative, members of the media don’t have access to the files and personnel necessary to develop these narratives on their own.

Selected members of the media rely on “leaks” that are really information dumps authorized by certain power brokers – Dianne Feinstein, Adam Schiff, etc. – to derive their narratives.

The Orangeman is bad narrative was planted by corrupt politicians and continues to be nurtured by them.

It’s important to consider how many of these “investigative reporters” are on the payroll of the CIA?

The more we know…