It’s Time to Purge the FBI of Loyal Globalists – Part Two

Elder Patriot – In Part one, we discussed how the FBI had been turned into a political tool to protect certain favored politicians and to destroy others who challenge the status quo.  That would be bad enough, but the FBI has also become facilitators of the Globalist gun control agenda by consistently turning its back on glaring evidence that should’ve been used to prevent a number of recent mass shootings. 

First, lets establish that the Globalist agenda demands disarming the common folk.  Second, lets establish that our Second Amendment guarantees every American the right to bear arms.

Given what should be the pre-eminence of what guides our laws – the U.S. Constitution – wouldn’t it make more sense to lower the threshold for search and surveillance warrants when these potential mass murderers have been identified. 

After all, we have apparently done exactly that in authorizing the ongoing witch-hunt against Donald Trump. 

And, rather than obliterate the Second Amendment rights of 100 million law-abiding gun owners we would only need to refine the fine points protecting the Fourth Amendment rights of a few dozen potential terrorists.

This fact forces us to examine whether any attempt to abridge the rights of Americans to keep and bear arms suggests bias towards the Globalist gun confiscation cause.

This discussion is especially relevant today as the nation is mourning the cold-blooded assassination of 17 young Americans at the hands of a psychotic “school shooter.”

That shooter, Nikolas Cruz was well known to the FBI but they chose to do nothing about him.  According to the Miami Herald, both his fellow students and teachers had identified him as a potential threat to other students prior to his expulsion from the high school where the carnage was allowed to happen.

I say, “allowed” because that’s exactly what the FBI did.  They ignored overwhelming evidence that cried out for a full-scale investigation of Cruz.

  • Cruz had been barred by school administrators from bringing a backpack to school prior to being expelled.

  • Any argument that the FBI was too busy chasing down jihadists falls flat after reviewing this Instagram post made by Cruz:
  • And this Twitter post:

  • 36 Separate alerts were ignored.

While the victims of Cruz’s rampage were still being accounted for multiple former classmates said, “we knew he’d shoot up the school.”

 

Other students believed they had heard enough gunfire to lead them to conclude that there had been at least one additional shooter.

So where the f*ck was the FBI and why are we being told Cruz was the lone gunman?

The same place they were when they made Stephen Paddock their patsy in covering up the terrorist attack in Las Vegas last October.

The same place they were when jihadist Omar Mateen’s murderous rampage at the Pulse nightclub took place before that.

Mateen’s rampage was allowed to proceed after the FBI had received warnings from a gun sore owner, Disney security and even a member of his own Muslim community that voiced their concerns about Mateen’s intentions.

The story surrounding the Vegas Harvest 91 massacre is more complicated and even more frightening.  In fact the FBI’s cover-up fell apart so quickly that the investigation went dark:

The important point is that the FBI has deliberately and consistently served as a pawn for the narrative that serves as the basis for globalist gun control efforts. 

Yes guns, specifically semi-automatic rifles, were the weapons of choice for many, if not all of of these mass shootings.  So were selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) hidden in the bloodstreams o the shooters.

And, so was the FBI knowledge of these shooters as well as the FBI’s decision not to act on that knowledge.

For perspective, let me recount of the story of someone who is well known to me.  Their ten-year old left a drawing of a frowny face – the opposite of a smiley face – in his desk at school.  That night two police officers paid the parents a visit.

Its time to face the fact that the massive surveillance state that has been funded by hardworking Americans has become one of the tool Globalists use to control us.

For the multi-trillions of dollars we have given the government they developed a super computer network that records every email, phone call and text message that Americans exchange.  “Authorities” also have a video camera network that records virtually every movement Americans make. 

The result is corporations now know everything about your financial status and buying habits, and police can more easily track down low-level street criminals.  But, the reason that Americans have tolerated the loss of their privacy, to provide law enforcement with the capability to intercede before terrorists can act, has been deliberately used for political purposes.

In Part one, we discussed how the FBI had been turned into a political tool to protect certain favored politicians and to destroy others who challenge the status quo.  That would be bad enough, but the FBI has also become facilitators of the Globalist gun control agenda by consistently turning its back on glaring evidence that should’ve been used to prevent a number of recent mass shootings. 

First, lets establish that the Globalist agenda demands disarming the common folk.  Second, lets establish that our Second Amendment guarantees every American the right to bear arms.

Given what should be the pre-eminence of what guides our laws – the U.S. Constitution – wouldn’t it make more sense to lower the threshold for search and surveillance warrants when these potential mass murderers have been identified. 

After all, we have apparently done exactly that in authorizing the ongoing witch-hunt against Donald Trump. 

And, rather than obliterate the Second Amendment rights of 100 million law-abiding gun owners we would only need to refine the fine points protecting the Fourth Amendment rights of a few dozen potential terrorists.

This fact forces us to examine whether any attempt to abridge the rights of Americans to keep and bear arms suggests bias towards the Globalist gun confiscation cause.

This discussion is especially relevant today as the nation is mourning the cold-blooded assassination of 17 young Americans at the hands of a psychotic “school shooter.”

That shooter, Nikolas Cruz was well known to the FBI but they chose to do nothing about him.  According to the Miami Herald, both his fellow students and teachers had identified him as a potential threat to other students prior to his expulsion from the high school where the carnage was allowed to happen.

I say, “allowed” because that’s exactly what the FBI did.  They ignored overwhelming evidence that cried out for a full-scale investigation of Cruz.

  • Cruz had been barred by school administrators from bringing a backpack to school prior to being expelled.

<iframe width=”560″ height=”315″ src=”https://www.youtube.com/embed/_iEC8yabIy8″ frameborder=”0″ allow=”autoplay; encrypted-media” allowfullscreen></iframe>

  • Any argument that the FBI was too busy chasing down jihadists falls flat after reviewing this Instagram post made by Cruz:
  • And this Twitter post:

https://twitter.com/realPolitiDiva/status/963908790897774592?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw

  • 36 Separate alerts were ignored.

While the victims of Cruz’s rampage were still being accounted for multiple former classmates said, “we knew he’d shoot up the school.”

https://twitter.com/WJXTvic/status/963899957559390210

Other students believed they had heard enough gunfire to lead them to conclude that there had been at least one additional shooter.

https://twitter.com/KHOUSportsMatt/status/963972590258806785

So where the f*ck was the FBI and why are we being told Cruz was the lone gunman?

The same place they were when they made Stephen Paddock their patsy in covering up the terrorist attack in Las Vegas last October.

The same place they were when jihadist Omar Mateen’s murderous rampage at the Pulse nightclub took place before that.

Mateen’s rampage was allowed to proceed after the FBI had received warnings from a gun sore owner, Disney security and even a member of his own Muslim community that voiced their concerns about Mateen’s intentions.

The story surrounding the Vegas Harvest 91 massacre is more complicated and even more frightening.  In fact the FBI’s cover-up fell apart so quickly that the investigation went dark:

The important point is that the FBI has deliberately and consistently served as a pawn for the narrative that serves as the basis for globalist gun control efforts. 

Yes guns, specifically semi-automatic rifles, were the weapons of choice for many, if not all of of these mass shootings.  So were selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) hidden in the bloodstreams o the shooters.

And, so was the FBI knowledge of these shooters as well as the FBI’s decision not to act on that knowledge.

For perspective, let me recount of the story of someone who is well known to me.  Their ten-year old left a drawing of a frowny face – the opposite of a smiley face – in his desk at school.  That night two police officers paid the parents a visit.

Its time to face the fact that the massive surveillance state that has been funded by hardworking Americans has become one of the tool Globalists use to control us.

For the multi-trillions of dollars we have given the government they developed a super computer network that records every email, phone call and text message that Americans exchange.  “Authorities” also have a video camera network that records virtually every movement Americans make. 

The result is corporations now know everything about your financial status and buying habits, and police can more easily track down low-level street criminals.  But, the reason that Americans have tolerated the loss of their privacy, to provide law enforcement with the capability to intercede before terrorists can act, has been deliberately used for political purposes.

If the FBI is not affected by political bias then why are they failing to prevent these shootings? 

Why do they remain mute in the immediate aftermath of these terrorist acts when the media rushes to blame White Nationalists when they know that’s not the case?

Let’s stop pretending the FBI is as pure as the driven snow.  It hasn’t been since its inception.  After its founder J Edgar Hoover died, a PBS documentary went into depth describing how the Director of the FBI for nearly 50 years, under eight presidents before his death in 1972, was “personally corrupt, sexually compromised and tainted by ties to organized crime,” according to an exhaustive Frontline investigation.  Hoover had been so severely corrupted that he denied the existence of the mafia.

Congress was given oversight over the FBI for precisely this reason.  Now that Congress is doing its job, gun-grabbing Democrats are going ballistic as though the bureau is, and has always been, some kind of sacred cow.

Why?

If the FBI is not affected by political bias then why are they failing to prevent these shootings? 

Why do they remain mute in the immediate aftermath of these terrorist acts when the media rushes to blame White Nationalists when they know that’s not the case?

Let’s stop pretending the FBI is as pure as the driven snow.  It hasn’t been since its inception.  After its founder J Edgar Hoover died, a PBS documentary went into depth describing how the Director of the FBI for nearly 50 years, under eight presidents before his death in 1972, was “personally corrupt, sexually compromised and tainted by ties to organized crime,” according to an exhaustive Frontline investigation.  Hoover had been so severely corrupted that he denied the existence of the mafia.

Congress was given oversight over the FBI for precisely this reason.  Now that Congress is doing its job, gun-grabbing Democrats are going ballistic as though the bureau is, and has always been, some kind of sacred cow.

Why?