The Real Reason Behind Waters and the Dems’ Jihad Against President Trump

ELDER PATRIOT – Maxine Water recently told a town hall gathering that she is “coming for Donald Trump.”

That’s a bold assertion in light of the fact that the, “Russia-Trump collusion” narrative she is relying on to prop up her feigned outrage has already been debunked by her state’s senior U.S. Senator, Diane Feinstein.  Feinstein is a Democrat who sits on the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence. 

This leaves Waters’ obsession bordering on psychosis but virtually every Democrat continues to echoes her sentiments, albeit using a more deliberative tone.  Why do they continue pounding this accusation when the man they have suddenly fallen in love with, deposed F.B.I. Director, James Comey said there was no ongoing investigations into President Trump?

The reason is self-preservation.  While the F.B.I. is charged with prosecuting corporate and governmental corruption, under Comey’s tenure it ignored or alibied for politicians who violated their fiduciary responsibilities when it came to protecting and defending American taxpayers.

Let’s make it simple.  Government is big business.  In fact with $3.5 trillion in annual revenue and the ability to borrow money at will, government is the biggest of businesses.  With all that money under the control of only 535 congressmen and senators there’s ample opportunity to divert tens of billions of dollars without detection.  Heck, even $35 billion is only one percent of total revenue, an amount that’s easy to obscure.

The more money flowing into government agencies, the more politicians get to divert into schemes that enrich themselves and their associates at the expense of the taxpayers.   

Of course that requires the police to look the other way.  And, James Comey was more than happy to do that.  Comey thought he had traded his integrity for job security.

Unfortunately, for Waters and the Democrats, who had grown increasingly more brazen in use of government programs to fill their pockets as well as those of their family and friends, Donald Trump got elected. 

Trump’s promise to “Drain the Swamp” resonated with voters who had grown disgusted with expanded government spending (and taxes) that failed to yield the results that they had been promised.

Everything from entitlements to defense had been turned into cash flow cows for corrupt politicians and Republicans were not exempt, though they were usually subtler and not as aggressive in demanding their “piece of the pie.”

Despite their best efforts, including those of Paul Ryan and Mitch McConnell, Donald Trump was elected.  Trump’s promise to end corruption threatens the very reason these politicos work so hard to raise millions of dollars to get elected to a job that pays less than $194,000 yearly, and come with term limits. 

Since Donald Trump got to town, dirty D.C. politicians became desperate to save their bacon (and their illicit schemes) and they resorted to the Clinton’s strategy of discrediting and demonizing the investigator(s). 

Suddenly, formerly highly respected Jeff Sessions has become a racist and a Russian conspirator.  Likewise with President Trump.  Remember Ken Starr was labeled a sex-obsessed prosecutor when in actuality he was investigating a sex-obsessed president. 

The effectiveness of this strategy led to Democrats’ increasing reliance on the politics of personal destruction to remain relevant after their socialist agenda became indefensible.

The assault on Ken Starr is enlightening because of the way the mainstream media assisted President Clinton in deflecting the charges against him onto the person running the investigation.

This brings us back to Maxine Waters who spent her entire career coddling the Russians with everything from calling for reduced military spending to applauding and defending Hillary Clinton’s inarguably anti-American handling of Russia that includes Clinton’s “Russian Reset” policy (that Hillary admitted on Russian state TV was intended to strengthen Russia,) selling off one-fifth of our country’s uranium to Russian companies, to the paid speeches she made in Russia and other paid deals as well as getting personal calls from Vladimir Putin.

Mad Max defended every aspect of Clinton’s handling of Russia.  It’s hard to fathom what more she could’ve done had she been paid directly by Putin.

Mad Max may or may not be a self-hating Black but at the very least she is a poverty pimp and in her world that makes her a racist.  Despite copious amounts of entitlement funding disproportionately directed towards her district, her constituents in South Central LA who continue living in squalor. 

The parts of Maxine’s district where her most ardent supporters live resemble a third world nation despite receiving billions of dollars in funding to improve conditions from the treasury of the “richest country” on earth.

Where does all of that government funding, earmarked for that district, end up?  It surely hasn’t improved the lives of the residents of her district that she has represented in one form or another for the 37 years of her public disservice. 

Water’s combined abuse of her constituents and the American taxpayer is an example of the way that an overwhelming percentage of our elected D.C. representatives do business.

If President Trump can find the right person to lead the F.B.I., and Senate Republicans confirm that person, Dirty Maxine and her co-conspirators in Congress will be held to account.

Just as important, the politics of personal destruction will finally fall to the rule of law.

HERE Is WHAT WILL HAPPEN If The DEEP STATE TAKES DOWN PRESIDENT TRUMP & It’s NOT PRETTY … FOR THEM “The tree of liberty must be refreshed with the blood of patriots and tyrants.” – Thomas Jefferson ELDER PATRIOT – Corrupt politicians ignore Jefferson’s directive to their own detriment. It’s no longer political, it’s personal. Americans have had their eyes opened by the ascension of Donald Trump and no amount of leftwing money can put the Freedom Movement genie back in the bottle. Conservative Senator Ted Cruz made that observation after reviewing the results of the 2016 elections and the expectations of the voters. Cruz, who had the most high profile personality clash with Donald Trump during the Republican primary process nevertheless embraced Trump’s America First agenda and said, “If we’re given the White House and both houses of Congress and we don’t deliver, I think there will be pitchforks and torches in the streets. And I think quite rightly.” Candidate Trump promised many things – border control, lower taxes, fairer trade relations, a balanced budget, healthcare that puts the people first not the government, safer communities, and – to the extent possible – an end to foreign wars. What, among those promises, should any Republican, nay any American, have a problem with? After four months without a single legislative achievement, Congressional and Senatorial Republicans – notably John McCain, Paul Ryan and Lindsey Graham – have joined the Democrats in investigating President Trump absent a single shred of evidence that an underlying crime has been committed. So, what gives? Well, there was one additional promise that Trump made on his way to the White House that has some Republicans joining with Democrats and quaking in their boots, Trump’s promise to “Drain the Swamp.” As we reported yesterday, “An F.B.I. agent with ‘intimate knowledge of the inner workings of the Clinton case’ told us that they uncovered evidence of such massive corruption that the agents involved realized that damned near the entire government could be brought down.” The criminal co-conspirators in both parties realized almost immediately that the new sheriff wasn’t interested in joining them in the swamp so they launched, what can only be characterized as, a coup attempt. Democrats are well schooled in such things probably because of their close alliance with Marxist regimes that can only gain power by seizing it through bloody civil wars. It should be noted that the Democratic Party has already done this once before. One Hundred and Fifty-Seven years ago the Democrats waged a war against the First Republican President Abraham Lincoln for giving Blacks their freedom. That war came at a high price, as many as 700,000 Americans died fighting for what they believe in. To put that in perspective, these casualties exceed the nation’s loss in all its other wars, from the Revolution through Vietnam. Today, Americans are still prepared to fight and die to protect their children’s God-given freedoms. Despite what you are reading and hearing in the mainstream media, they aren’t the leftwing-funded rioters, the pussy hat-wearing feminists, or the cuck bois that cant handle a micro aggression. No, the Americans that back Donald Trump are well armed. Donald Trump’s presidency will move forward politically lest the sixty million patriots who voted for him, that are comprised of the large majority of military voters, police, and NRA members, move it forward by force. These patriots are armed, trained, prepared, and have proven their discipline. They have grown disgusted by the corruption in Washington and will do whatever is necessary to make sure Trump’s Freedom Agenda moves forward and under the direction of Donald Trump himself. No amount of fake news based on unsubstantiated charges by unnamed sources is going to change that. The battle lines have been drawn and no amount of finger pointing is going to convince these patriots to let anyone overturn the election results. So why are establishment politicians courting a bloodbath on the streets of America that will also threaten them personally when they could be part of Making America Great Again? It’s because they have been caught red-handed and up to their eyeballs in a worldwide criminal conspiracy that has nothing to do with politics and everything to do with defrauding the American taxpayers. And, now that they’ve been caught robbing the world’s largest bank – the U.S. treasury – they have chosen to go out in a blaze of glory rather than try to defend the indefensible at trial. Washington’s criminal elites have chosen to go to war to unseat our duly elected president. It’s time to make our voices heard before this turns very ugly. Buckle your chin strap, America is counting on you. EDITORS NOTE: THIS IS NOT A CALL TO ARMS BUT RATHER AN ANALYSIS OF WHAT WOULD HAPPEN IF THE DEEP STATES OVERTURNS A DUELY ELECTED PRESIDENT. HERE IS A LIST OF EVERY SINGLE TIME OBAMA COMMITTED AN IMPEACHABLE OFFENSE THAT DEMS & MEDIA COVERED UP “Impeach!” It’s been more than eight years since Democrats uttered that word – long enough for anyone to wonder if it was still in their vocabulary, considering the deafening silence through the dozens of serious scandals during President Obama’s administration – but now that President Trump is the man in the White House, it’s back with a vengeance. Democrats everywhere are wildly slinging the “I” word, hoping to nail Trump for high crimes and misdemeanors after the New York Times claimed a memo written by former FBI Director James Comey said the president urged him to end the federal investigation into former national security adviser Michael Flynn. Some members of Congress are getting in on the action. They include Reps. Maxine Water, D-Calif., and Al Green, D-Texas. Even a Republican, Rep. Justin Amash, claimed Wednesday there are grounds to impeach President Trump. House Oversign Committee Chair Rep. Jason Chaffetz, R-Utah, asked for the alleged Comey memo and other documents. Chaffetz tweeted that he is prepared to subpoena the information. And Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., invoked “Watergate.” Now the Democratic Party is reportedly poll testing impeachment as a 2018 election issue. More than 1 million people signed a petition calling on Congress to impeach Trump. Wasting no time Wednesday, the mainstream media sprang into action, enthusiastically echoing the left’s impeachment calls. MSNBC launched a Watergate ad implying Trump is America’s new Richard Nixon. “Watergate. We know its name because there were reporters who never stopped asking questions,” says MSNBC host Chris Hayes, who hinted that Trump is next on the impeachment chopping block. “Now, who knows where the questions will take us. But I know this: I’m not going to stop asking them.” Meanwhile, some overzealous members of the left plastered fliers around Washington, D.C., demanding all White House staffers resign Wednesday. The posters read: “If you work for this White House you are complicit in hate-mongering, lies, corrupt taking of Americans’ tax money via self-dealing and emoluments, and quite possibly federal crimes and treason. Also, any wars will be on your soul. … Resign now.” But constitutional scholar Jonathan Turley, who voted for President Obama, warned “impeachment” enthusiasts not to get ahead of themselves with President Trump. Why? At this time, there’s no evidence Trump actually committed a crime. “The criminal code demands more than what Comey reportedly describes in his memo,” Turley wrote in a May 17 opinion piece posted at the Hill. Turley explained: For the first time, the Comey memo pushes the litany of controversies surrounding Trump into the scope of the United States criminal code. However, if this is food for obstruction of justice, it is still an awfully thin soup. Some commentators seem to be alleging criminal conduct in office or calling for impeachment before Trump completed the words of his inaugural oath of office. Not surprising, within minutes of the New York Times report, the response was a chorus of breathless “gotcha” announcements. But this memo is neither the Pentagon Papers nor the Watergate tapes. Indeed, it raises as many questions for Comey as it does Trump in terms of the alleged underlying conduct. A good place to start would be with the federal law, specifically 18 U.S.C. 1503. The criminal code demands more than what Comey reportedly describes in his memo. There are dozens of different variations of obstruction charges ranging from threatening witnesses to influencing jurors. None would fit this case. That leaves the omnibus provision on attempts to interfere with the “due administration of justice.” However, that still leaves the need to show that the effort was to influence “corruptly” when Trump could say that he did little but express concern for a longtime associate. The term “corruptly” is actually defined differently under the various obstruction provisions, but it often involves a showing that someone acted “with the intent to secure an unlawful benefit for oneself or another.” Encouraging leniency or advocating for an associate is improper but not necessarily seeking an unlawful benefit for him. . Obama’s Iran nuke deal Obama knew about Hillary’s private email server Obama IRS targets conservatives Obama’s DOJ spies on AP reporters Obamacare & Obama’s false promises Illegal-alien amnesty by executive order Benghazi-gate Operation Fast & Furious 5 Taliban leaders for Bergdahl Extortion 17 ‘Recess ‘ appointments – when Senate was in session Appointment of ‘czars’ without Senate approval Suing Arizona for enforcing federal law Refusal to defend Defense of Marriage Act Illegally conducting war against Libya NSA: Spying on Americans Muslim Brotherhood ties Miriam Carey Birth certificate Executive orders Solyndra and the lost $535 million Egypt Cap & Trade: When in doubt, bypass Congress Refusal to prosecute New Black Panthers Obama’s U.S. citizen ‘hit list’