Anyone doubting the craven nature of the modern Democratic Party must please explain their latest ploy.
Reps. Lee Zeldin (R-NY), Chris Stewart (R-UT), and Andy Biggs (R-AZ) joined Fox News’ Laura Ingraham to explain:
Rep. Andy Biggs (R-AZ): …the word came out tonight, they’re not even going to let these guys, members of the committee, get access to the transcripts anymore.
Laura Ingraham: What? What? Whoa-woah-woah… What is the, what are they doing that for? Why are they doing that?
Rep. Lee Zeldin (R-NY): they want to be able to prepare their report. And they don’t want to let us to get the rest of the information out.
Republicans have been barred from even viewing transcripts taken during impeachment hearings. This includes the transcripts of Executive Branch employees who, it has been reported, have provided largely exculpatory testimony.
Testimony, that because of Pelosi’s rules, we’ll never see. Neither will House Republicans or President Trump’s attorneys.
Schiff/Pelosi-led Democrats will craft the narrative and the limited ‘factual’ evidence that becomes public in a carefully managed scheme to shape public opinion.
Does this sound familiar? It should:
“The truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by extension, the truth is the greatest enemy of the state.”
This is the latest attempt to silence the defense of President Trump while Democrats rely on the echo chamber of their media allies to present cherry-picked passages to move public opinion to support their illicit scam.
Here’s one example of how the narrative is being crafted and supported by the equally corrupt mainstream media:
Swamp guardian Chris Wallace presented this limited text message exchange as evidence of a quid pro quo:
Here’s what wasn’t shown and that Pelosi ignored in cherry-picked fact sheet she released yesterday:
Republicans are not permitted to call defense witnesses of their own.
Democrats are so paranoid about keeping a lid on the proceedings that at least some of the hearings are said to have been conducted in a SCIF that has been, up until now, reserved for holding top secret discussions or for reviewing highly-classified evidence.
This ain’t that.
Americans who are watching these latter-day Democrats should ask themselves if they can do this to a president, what chance they would have against these authoritarians?