Oh My! Ford’s Massive Lie During Senate Testimony Opens Major “Can of Worms”!!!

Elder Patriot – Experienced sex crimes prosecutor Rachel Mitchell – according to the pundits, the ineffective and innocuous questioner of accuser Christine Blasey-Ford – hit another home run when she engaged in this series of questions and answers with Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh’s accuser:

MITCHELL: Have you ever had discussions with anyone, beside your attorneys, on how to take a polygraph?

FORD: Never.

MITCHELL: And I don’t just mean countermeasures, but I mean just any sort of tips, or anything like that.

FORD: No. I was scared of the test itself, but was comfortable that I could tell the information, and the test would reveal whatever it was going to reveal. I didn’t expect it to be as long as it was going to be, so it was a little bit stressful.

MITCHELL: Had — have you ever given tips or advice to somebody who was looking to take a polygraph test?

FORD: Never.

Ahem.  Alarm bells.

Did Mitchell stumble upon this lines of questioning solely by accident?  Read on.

Evidence, in the form of a letter from her boyfriend of six years, surfaced yesterday challenging those ironclad assertions Blasey-Ford made under oath to the Senate Judiciary Committee.   

The name of the alleged boyfriend has been redacted at his request:

Did Ford experience a simple lapse of memory or was her declaration perjurious with intent to deceive?

The McLean referenced in the letter is Monica Lee McLean, a former FBI agent and life-long friend of Ford’s since their time together at Holton-Arms as members of the class of 1984.

According to Ford’s testimony under questioning by prosecutor Mitchell:

MITCHELL: The second is the letter that you wrote to Senator Feinstein, dated the — July 30th of this year.  Did you write the letter yourself?

FORD: I did.

MITCHELL: And I — since it’s dated July 30th, did you write it on that date?

FORD: I believe so. I — it sounds right. I was in Rehoboth, Delaware, at the time. I could look into my calendar and try to figure that out. It seemed…

MITCHELL: Was it written on or about that date?

FORD: Yes, yes. I traveled, I think, the 26th of July to Rehoboth, Delaware. So that makes sense, because I wrote it from there.

MITCHELL: Is the letter accurate? FORD: I’ll take a minute to read it.

That’s a bit of coincidence isn’t it, since her friend Monica McClean just happens to live in

Rehoboth, Delaware, as well?

So here is Ford, spending time with her lifelong friend, who she just happened to have coached on beating polygraphs, likely getting help crafting her letter to corrupt Senator Dianne Feinstein.  

Oh, and McLean had previously worked as an attorney and Public Information Officer for the FBI from 1992 until 2016 – under Robert Mueller, James Comey and Andrew McCabe.

Was McLean assigned to be Blasey-Ford’s handler?  Did she help her scrub her internet history and social media accounts?  What role did she play, if any, in identifying the retired FBI polygrapher who administered to the test to Ford?

There was nothing unusual about the polygrapher asking only two questions but that doesn’t square with Ford’s testimony that the polygraph took a long time.  That is unless, he administered the test multiple times until he was able to get the desired response.

Now let’s turn our attention to Ford’s attorney, Michael Bromwich who also represents former corrupt FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe as he seeks to defend himself against the findings of Inspector General Michael Horowitz.

McCabe, now under a grand jury probe, was a major player in, if not the orchestrator of, the Trump “insurance policy” that took root under Director Comey and eventually led to the appointment of special counsel Mueller.

If McCabe goes down the entire Deep State might go down with him.  There big money and many criminal indictments riding on protecting McCabe.

Bromwich served as Inspector General of the DOJ from 1994 to 1999.  What’s the chance that Bromwich still has contact with corrupt holdovers within the FBI and DOJ?

This brings us full circle to Christine Blasey-Ford.

Fordnews.com reports that:

Christine’s father, Ralph G Blasey Jr. Had worked for the CIA and was a vice president, at one time, for the National Savings and Trust “black budget bank” allegedly known for funding CIA deep state operations.

Her Brother, Ralph Blasey JR., is still a Vice President for a security guard corporation that provides protection to Deep state entities.

And Christine Blasey Ford currently oversees the CIA Undergraduate Internship Program Stanford University developed by the notorious CIA-connected Stanford University Psychiatric Professor Dr. Frederick T. Melges-who himself, in 1985, took into his care the homeless woman Lois Lang who assassinated CIA paymaster Nick Deak-and that afterwards saw the CIA’s black operations monies being controlled by Ralph G. Blasey Jr.-who, not so mysteriously, just happens to be the father of Dr. Christine Blasey.

It should be noted that, Facebook and the tech left’s official thought police, Snopes, denies these claims.

If this is true would it be a stretch to investigate whether Christine Blasey was a product of the CIA’s MK-Ultra program.  Has she been programmed to be a sex assault sleeper?

We know these people exist.  According to numerous sources, including this one, Cathy O’Brien is one of them.  Here she is at a press conference. You can decide her credibility for yourself.

This may all be highly questionable and may sound unbelievable to many people.  But, it is more believable, considering all that we have learned about the government’s Deep State Trump resistance, than Brett Kavanaugh being the monster they have portrayed him as.