NYU Study: Hillary is More Deplorable Than You Thought!!!

ELDER PATRIOT – An NYU experiment designed to reveal that Hillary Clinton didn’t win the presidential election as a result of voters having an innate bias against her because she is a woman failed miserably in the attempt, and left the professors who conducted the experiment “unsettled.”

The experiment was conducted by having two actors carefully study the words and actions of Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton.  The male actor studied Hillary closely in order to emulate her personal characteristics as closely as possible.  The female actor did the same with Donald Trump.

Then the debates were re-enacted.  The actors portraying the candidates sought to emulate the two candidates debate performances, especially their gestures and intonations, exactly.

The two professors, Maria Guadalupe and Joe Salvatore had hoped to show that gender bias was the root cause of Clinton’s loss.  Like the rest of the psycho left that refuses to accept the results of the election, the professors decided that they just had to prove Hillary lost because Americans are hopelessly sexist.

To say the experiments backfired is an understatement.

As the mock debates unfolded it became obvious that Hillary was even more unlikable as a man.  And, Trump became more likable when his mannerisms and words were manifested in the body of a woman.

After the performance audience members were asked for their impressions of both candidates:

One man said, “I was struck by the strength of the technique of the Brenda King (Donald Trump) character.  Attack. Consistently attack. Never stop attacking.”

Asked about the way the male actor emulated that “let’s not stoop to that level, but can you believe this” smile that Clinton displayed consistently throughout the debates, one woman said that she found that constant smirk “really punchable.”

Another woman admitted that while she was watching the female version of Trump, “When she was attacking, I had so much respect for her and her level of confidence.”

A Hillary supporter painfully concluded of the male version of Hillary “I felt that he was weak and I felt that I didn’t really like him.”

One of the professors who organized this experiment, Joe Salvatore admitted:

“We both thought that the inversion would confirm our liberal assumption—that no one would have accepted Trump’s behavior from a woman, and that the male Clinton would seem like the much stronger candidate.  But we kept checking in with each other and realized that this disruption—a major change in perception—was happening. I had an unsettled feeling the whole way through.”

“The simplicity of Trump’s message became easier for people to hear when it was coming from a woman.”

“At the time of the debates, I dismissed him as awkward, unskilled, untrained in an email to the Times.  Now I’m not so sure that I would do that.”

Well, well, well!  So Hillary really was the deplorable one!!!  And, Trump isn’t sexist, it’s the hypocrites on the left who are.  But then, we already knew that.

Now the delusional left must deal with the fact that we could’ve had our first female president if only – get ready for this – she was more like Donald Trump!  Hahahahahaha.