If Islamists Controlled Our Government…What Would Be Different?

ELDER PATRIOT – They would rule that any attempt to limit immigration from Muslim nations was unconstitutional in denial of our national security interests and in defiance of the Constitution. 

In furtherance of this effort to infiltrate western societies they would redirect tax dollars from Social Security and Medicare recipients and spend that money instead on the costs to bring unvetted Muslims into the U.S. and towards supplying them with food, shelter and life’s other necessities.

They would direct sending hundreds of billions of U.S. taxpayer dollars to Islamic nations that have declared their desire to establish a worldwide caliphate.

They would pay nothing more than lip service to stopping Iran’s development of its nuclear weapons capability.  Not since Khrushchev pounded his shoe on the U.N. podium has a nation’s leader sworn to annihilate the U.S. as Iran has.   

Given the Iranian’s embrace of terrorist tactics, its intention to expand its influence throughout the Middle East and beyond, and its belief that death resulting from the effort is Allah’s highest reward, a nuclearized Iran will make Russia’s regional threat look minor. 

They would order the U.S. military to conduct a proxy war against neighboring Iraq to eliminate the counterbalance it had maintained to Iranian hegemony.

Of course we did exactly that following 9/11 ignoring the Saudi’s involvement in the 9/11 World Trade Center attacks.

They would start wars or incite civil unrest elsewhere in the region – Syria and Yemen in addition to Iraq in the Middle East and Libya and Somalia in North Africa – to soften them as targets for the country or alliance of countries (Saudi Arabia and Iran) that emerges seeking regional control.

They would work with and arm Saudi Arabia and terrorist organizations like al Qaeda and Isis to further destabilize the region.

They would block, by any means possible, a U.S.-Russia alliance that would threaten the strict fundamentalist Wahhabi Islamic order that has as its goal the destruction of Judeo-Christian societies across the globe.

They would order intelligence agencies to destroy anyone who sought to establish a healthier relationship with Russia as they did over the past two days to President Trump’s highly decorated and respected patriot, National Security Director Michael Flynn.

They would turn their sights on the president using their deeply seated operatives within the nation’s intelligence agencies to eavesdrop on him and then release unsubstantiated incriminating about his administration.

Keep in mind this is the same entrenched intelligence bureaucracy that led us into a war that has helped Iran and Saudi Arabia get closer to their goals of Mid-East dominance based on totally ginned up evidence.  Now the would like us to believe that Donald Trump is a Russian agent based only on his desire to improve relations with a country that could be a strategic partner because that relationship would threaten the rising caliphate.

Islamist running the government would order the state-controlled media to ignore reporting when then candidate Obama’s representative Robert Malley met with Hamas and Iran but to blow out of all proportion Trump’s National Security Director-designate Michael Flynn for conducting preliminary introductory phone calls with his Russian counterpart.

Remembering back to 2008, the state-controlled media and the intelligence community ignored all sense of proportionality and truth, when they refused to report on former consultant to the National Security Council and U.S. Defense Department Michael Ledeen’s disclosure of Obama’s unauthorized back-channel negotiations with Iran that was in violation of the Logan Act!

Investigative journalist Aaron Klein reported in Breitbart:

“Michael Ledeen, a former consultant to the National Security Council and U.S. Defense Department, penned a column at PJ Media stating Obama opened a back-channel to Iran during the 2008 presidential campaign. Ledeen said the back channel went through retired Ambassador William G. Miller, who also led the 1979 negotiating mission during the Iran hostage crisis. Ladeen wrote that Miller confirmed his back-channel involvement to him.

“Ledeen wrote:

“The actual strategy is detente first, and then a full alliance with Iran throughout the Middle East and North Africa.”

Instead, they would then use the false claims against Flynn to call for investigations into the entire Trump administration with the goal of neutering Trump’s ability to drain the swamp in which these Islamists are hiding behind the premise that Trump and his advisors cannot be trusted when they expose the depth of anti-American pro-Islamic sentiment that exists in the Deep State and within the halls of Congress.

President Trump is aware of this threat and is resolute in his determination to root it out of our government but he is dependent on us to remain as resolute in our support of his efforts as we were when we elected him. 

Buckle your chinstrap because now is no time to go wobbly.  We finally have a leader with a brass pair.  Rest assured we have barely begun to fight!

HERE Is WHAT WILL HAPPEN If The DEEP STATE TAKES DOWN PRESIDENT TRUMP & It’s NOT PRETTY … FOR THEM “The tree of liberty must be refreshed with the blood of patriots and tyrants.” – Thomas Jefferson ELDER PATRIOT – Corrupt politicians ignore Jefferson’s directive to their own detriment. It’s no longer political, it’s personal. Americans have had their eyes opened by the ascension of Donald Trump and no amount of leftwing money can put the Freedom Movement genie back in the bottle. Conservative Senator Ted Cruz made that observation after reviewing the results of the 2016 elections and the expectations of the voters. Cruz, who had the most high profile personality clash with Donald Trump during the Republican primary process nevertheless embraced Trump’s America First agenda and said, “If we’re given the White House and both houses of Congress and we don’t deliver, I think there will be pitchforks and torches in the streets. And I think quite rightly.” Candidate Trump promised many things – border control, lower taxes, fairer trade relations, a balanced budget, healthcare that puts the people first not the government, safer communities, and – to the extent possible – an end to foreign wars. What, among those promises, should any Republican, nay any American, have a problem with? After four months without a single legislative achievement, Congressional and Senatorial Republicans – notably John McCain, Paul Ryan and Lindsey Graham – have joined the Democrats in investigating President Trump absent a single shred of evidence that an underlying crime has been committed. So, what gives? Well, there was one additional promise that Trump made on his way to the White House that has some Republicans joining with Democrats and quaking in their boots, Trump’s promise to “Drain the Swamp.” As we reported yesterday, “An F.B.I. agent with ‘intimate knowledge of the inner workings of the Clinton case’ told us that they uncovered evidence of such massive corruption that the agents involved realized that damned near the entire government could be brought down.” The criminal co-conspirators in both parties realized almost immediately that the new sheriff wasn’t interested in joining them in the swamp so they launched, what can only be characterized as, a coup attempt. Democrats are well schooled in such things probably because of their close alliance with Marxist regimes that can only gain power by seizing it through bloody civil wars. It should be noted that the Democratic Party has already done this once before. One Hundred and Fifty-Seven years ago the Democrats waged a war against the First Republican President Abraham Lincoln for giving Blacks their freedom. That war came at a high price, as many as 700,000 Americans died fighting for what they believe in. To put that in perspective, these casualties exceed the nation’s loss in all its other wars, from the Revolution through Vietnam. Today, Americans are still prepared to fight and die to protect their children’s God-given freedoms. Despite what you are reading and hearing in the mainstream media, they aren’t the leftwing-funded rioters, the pussy hat-wearing feminists, or the cuck bois that cant handle a micro aggression. No, the Americans that back Donald Trump are well armed. Donald Trump’s presidency will move forward politically lest the sixty million patriots who voted for him, that are comprised of the large majority of military voters, police, and NRA members, move it forward by force. These patriots are armed, trained, prepared, and have proven their discipline. They have grown disgusted by the corruption in Washington and will do whatever is necessary to make sure Trump’s Freedom Agenda moves forward and under the direction of Donald Trump himself. No amount of fake news based on unsubstantiated charges by unnamed sources is going to change that. The battle lines have been drawn and no amount of finger pointing is going to convince these patriots to let anyone overturn the election results. So why are establishment politicians courting a bloodbath on the streets of America that will also threaten them personally when they could be part of Making America Great Again? It’s because they have been caught red-handed and up to their eyeballs in a worldwide criminal conspiracy that has nothing to do with politics and everything to do with defrauding the American taxpayers. And, now that they’ve been caught robbing the world’s largest bank – the U.S. treasury – they have chosen to go out in a blaze of glory rather than try to defend the indefensible at trial. Washington’s criminal elites have chosen to go to war to unseat our duly elected president. It’s time to make our voices heard before this turns very ugly. Buckle your chin strap, America is counting on you. EDITORS NOTE: THIS IS NOT A CALL TO ARMS BUT RATHER AN ANALYSIS OF WHAT WOULD HAPPEN IF THE DEEP STATES OVERTURNS A DUELY ELECTED PRESIDENT. HERE IS A LIST OF EVERY SINGLE TIME OBAMA COMMITTED AN IMPEACHABLE OFFENSE THAT DEMS & MEDIA COVERED UP “Impeach!” It’s been more than eight years since Democrats uttered that word – long enough for anyone to wonder if it was still in their vocabulary, considering the deafening silence through the dozens of serious scandals during President Obama’s administration – but now that President Trump is the man in the White House, it’s back with a vengeance. Democrats everywhere are wildly slinging the “I” word, hoping to nail Trump for high crimes and misdemeanors after the New York Times claimed a memo written by former FBI Director James Comey said the president urged him to end the federal investigation into former national security adviser Michael Flynn. Some members of Congress are getting in on the action. They include Reps. Maxine Water, D-Calif., and Al Green, D-Texas. Even a Republican, Rep. Justin Amash, claimed Wednesday there are grounds to impeach President Trump. House Oversign Committee Chair Rep. Jason Chaffetz, R-Utah, asked for the alleged Comey memo and other documents. Chaffetz tweeted that he is prepared to subpoena the information. And Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., invoked “Watergate.” Now the Democratic Party is reportedly poll testing impeachment as a 2018 election issue. More than 1 million people signed a petition calling on Congress to impeach Trump. Wasting no time Wednesday, the mainstream media sprang into action, enthusiastically echoing the left’s impeachment calls. MSNBC launched a Watergate ad implying Trump is America’s new Richard Nixon. “Watergate. We know its name because there were reporters who never stopped asking questions,” says MSNBC host Chris Hayes, who hinted that Trump is next on the impeachment chopping block. “Now, who knows where the questions will take us. But I know this: I’m not going to stop asking them.” Meanwhile, some overzealous members of the left plastered fliers around Washington, D.C., demanding all White House staffers resign Wednesday. The posters read: “If you work for this White House you are complicit in hate-mongering, lies, corrupt taking of Americans’ tax money via self-dealing and emoluments, and quite possibly federal crimes and treason. Also, any wars will be on your soul. … Resign now.” But constitutional scholar Jonathan Turley, who voted for President Obama, warned “impeachment” enthusiasts not to get ahead of themselves with President Trump. Why? At this time, there’s no evidence Trump actually committed a crime. “The criminal code demands more than what Comey reportedly describes in his memo,” Turley wrote in a May 17 opinion piece posted at the Hill. Turley explained: For the first time, the Comey memo pushes the litany of controversies surrounding Trump into the scope of the United States criminal code. However, if this is food for obstruction of justice, it is still an awfully thin soup. Some commentators seem to be alleging criminal conduct in office or calling for impeachment before Trump completed the words of his inaugural oath of office. Not surprising, within minutes of the New York Times report, the response was a chorus of breathless “gotcha” announcements. But this memo is neither the Pentagon Papers nor the Watergate tapes. Indeed, it raises as many questions for Comey as it does Trump in terms of the alleged underlying conduct. A good place to start would be with the federal law, specifically 18 U.S.C. 1503. The criminal code demands more than what Comey reportedly describes in his memo. There are dozens of different variations of obstruction charges ranging from threatening witnesses to influencing jurors. None would fit this case. That leaves the omnibus provision on attempts to interfere with the “due administration of justice.” However, that still leaves the need to show that the effort was to influence “corruptly” when Trump could say that he did little but express concern for a longtime associate. The term “corruptly” is actually defined differently under the various obstruction provisions, but it often involves a showing that someone acted “with the intent to secure an unlawful benefit for oneself or another.” Encouraging leniency or advocating for an associate is improper but not necessarily seeking an unlawful benefit for him. . Obama’s Iran nuke deal Obama knew about Hillary’s private email server Obama IRS targets conservatives Obama’s DOJ spies on AP reporters Obamacare & Obama’s false promises Illegal-alien amnesty by executive order Benghazi-gate Operation Fast & Furious 5 Taliban leaders for Bergdahl Extortion 17 ‘Recess ‘ appointments – when Senate was in session Appointment of ‘czars’ without Senate approval Suing Arizona for enforcing federal law Refusal to defend Defense of Marriage Act Illegally conducting war against Libya NSA: Spying on Americans Muslim Brotherhood ties Miriam Carey Birth certificate Executive orders Solyndra and the lost $535 million Egypt Cap & Trade: When in doubt, bypass Congress Refusal to prosecute New Black Panthers Obama’s U.S. citizen ‘hit list’