Hillary Clinton’s Violation of Federal Law Is No Longer In Doubt

ELDER PATRIOT – There is now undisputable evidence that Hillary Clinton’s lawyers deliberately destroyed evidence in violation of 18 U.S. Code § 1519 that covers the destruction, alteration, or falsification of records in Federal investigations and bankruptcy.

18 U.S. Code § 1519 is clear:

“Whoever knowingly alters, destroys, mutilates, conceals, covers up, falsifies, or makes a false entry in any record, document, or tangible object with the intent to impede, obstruct, or influence the investigation or proper administration of any matter within the jurisdiction of any department or agency of the United States or any case filed under title 11, or in relation to or contemplation of any such matter or case, shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both.”

Representative Jim Jordan of the House Committee on Oversight Government Reform appeared on the Lou Dobbs show Thursday night and laid out the open and shut case against Hillary Clinton and her legal team.

The case against Mrs. Clinton starts on March of 2015 when Team Clinton destroyed documents that were under subpoena and under a federal preservation order.  The timeline reveals the desperate speed with which her minions acted:

March 2nd – The NY Times reports Clinton’s use of a personal, unsecure server.

March 3rd – The next morning a preservation order is sent from the Committee investigation what went wrong in Benghazi

March 4th – Within 24 hours a subpoena is issued for Mrs. Clinton’s emails

March 9th – Once it is known that Platte River Networks is the server provider for Mrs. Clinton’s “private” server they are put on notice that both a preservation order and a subpoena has been issued to protect and turn over the entirety of the contents on Mrs. Clinton’s server.

March 10th – Hillary gives a press conference where it has now been established that she deflected, obfuscated and flat out lied through her teeth.

March 25th – David Kendall and Cheryl Mills have a conference call with Platter River Networks – within the next 5 days BleachBit is used to scrub her server in a manner that makes data reconstruction impossible.  The Platte River Network employee on that conference call has never been identified.  When the FBI asked that employee what was discussed on that conference call he refused to divulge any information whatsoever.

Rep. Jordan tied it all together so that even a Clinton sycophant can’t deny what had happened:

“When you have a guy who is with Platte River Networks who in on a conference call with David Kendall and Cheryl Mills and then destroys documents with BleachBit, when that happened and he won’t answer questions, he claims privilege, whether the Fifth Amendment privilege or the attorney-client privilege we’re unsure, the first thing we need to know is who is that guy, what’s his name and we need to bring him in front of Congress and see if he take the Fifth in front of our committee.”

Why did the FBI limit their investigation exclusively to the classification issue?  After all, the FBI became famous for their successful prosecution of Chicago underworld kingpin Al Capone by gaining his conviction on charges of…income tax evasion!

The prospect that the FBI chose to limit its investigation into whether Mrs. Clinton had violated the Espionage Act is now looking like it was only because it afforded Director James Comey some wiggle room to apply the standard of “intent” to her actions even though the law governing the mishandling of classified documents is clear that intent isn’t a necessary proof to be found in violation of this law that protects our national security.

Who wrote Director Comey’s determination not to recommend indictment?  Was it Bill Clinton who became famous for this defense, “It’s according to what the meaning of ‘is’ is?”

There is no excuse that Mrs. Clinton can use to wiggle her way out of this.

When, in the history of federal prosecutions, has a person charged with violating the law been granted permission for their attorneys to determine what the prosecution gets to see?  If this was the standard employed for everyone we could just dispense with federal prosecutions and close down our federal prison system.

The destruction of even a single email, let alone the 33,000 that Kendall and Mills ordered destroyed, proves intent by virtue of the fact that it took an overt action to accomplish that.

Once BleachBit was used to “acid-wash” the server any and all doubt that forensic reconstruction of the emails that were deleted would’ve proved harmful to Hillary was gone.  Only the most blinded Hillary supporter could believe that her personal emails warranted such extreme action, especially when a court order of preservation was in place.

Clinton, Kendall and Mills knew what they were doing.  Every first year law student is aware of the rules governing the preservation of evidence and the punishment that goes along with violating those laws.

The fact that Kendall and Mills were on the conference call is evidence a conspiracy.  We can only conclude that whatever they destroyed posed a far bigger threat to Mrs. Clinton than being found guilty of violating 18 U.S. Code § 1519.

It is now apparent that Director Comey dedicated 150 FBI agents in the creation of a smokescreen to protect Mrs. Clinton’s political aspirations.  By focusing the public’s attention on her violations of the Espionage Act he distracted their attention from the more ironclad proof that could not be denied – her complicity with the willful and deliberate destruction of evidence.

Attorneys Kendall and Mills are not neophytes.  They most likely protected themselves from prosecution in some manner.  Perhaps they are planning on taking the fall for Madam Hillary with the knowledge that she will win the election and afterwards pardon both. 

There is simply no other way to interpret these events.

Watch Rep. Jordan spell it all out for Lou Dobbs:

What does this tell us about the #NeverTrump Republicans? 

Why are they welcoming the elevation of a proven criminal to the highest law enforcement position in the world? 

Why would they grant her access to our nuclear arsenal when so much attention is directed at limiting the access to weapons by the criminal elements in our society?

It’s frightening to contemplate that the entire political establishment has been corrupted by the Clintons.  When the politicians and their appointees refuse to enforce the laws that apply to the rest of us, it is time for us to do something about it.  Remember that this November when you head to the polls.