Here’s What We’ve Learned Since Jan 20th – Federal Elections Are Expensive Dog and Pony Shows That Mean Nothing

ELDER PATRIOT – American citizens, having watched their government represent everyone else but them, and then shamelessly receive a bill from the IRS for the cost, decided they had enough.

They had enough of Republicans and they let the party know it when they chose an outsider to be the Republican standard-bearer.

They had enough of Democrats, and especially of Hillary Clinton, and again chose the outsider.

Trump officially won 31 states but it is more likely than not that he won at least five additional states except for the probability that voters in those states were victims of election fraud. Think I’m blowing smoke?  Then why is everyone in Congress up in arms for Trump’s call for what amounts to an audit of our electoral system?

The message from November 8th was loud and clear, Americans want their government back.

Well, it’s time to wake up and come to terms with the fact that it isn’t going to be as easy as casting a vote. 

It has become overwhelmingly obvious that the majority of both houses of congress aren’t just recipients of outlandish amounts of corporate and special interest money – including funds originating from foreign entities – these entities own members of Congress. 

Your twenty dollar or one hundred dollar political contribution might make you feel better but it means nothing compared to the five, six, and even seven figure contributions from corporations, PACs, and foreign “investors.”  That kind of money doesn’t just buy influence it buys unwavering loyalty.  It buys corporate welfare, foreign policy decisions, and even war.  In one way or another, it buys access to your tax dollars.

The majority of representatives and senators have whored themselves to the highest bidders and are nothing more than well-placed lobbyists.  It’s way past time to realize we, the people, don’t mean sh*t to them.  And, neither do our children who they force vaccines on, send to lousy schools, and even callously spill their blood fighting wars that serve their goals not our own.

The tidal wave of resistance coming from Congress and the Senate, in the four months following the election, blocking the voters’ America First agenda leaves no doubt that they have no intention of respecting your will.

While the Democrats are the president’s most vocal critics, Republicans have done their part by obstructing Trump’s agenda.  While they appear to be arguing over the best way to fix everything from healthcare to the economy to immigration, they are really doing their part in giving Democrats wide berth to influence public opinion against President Trump.

Imagine for just a minute, how the Democrats charges would be received by the public if Trump’s pro-growth, pro law and order agenda had already been enacted.  That it hasn’t advanced more quickly makes Republicans co-conspirators in denying the election results and protecting the status quo.

Now these anti-American forces are relying on an allegation by former F.B.I. Director James Comey, a man who was fired by President Trump for malfeasance at best or corruption at worst, to attack the president on grounds that the president committed obstruction of justice because, according to Comey, the president allegedly asked him to drop the Michael Flynn investigation.

The White House has denied the president asked Comey to do that, but Comey’s word apparently trumps Trump’s.  The forces working against us in Congress choose to ignore that Comey’s credibility is seriously damaged after he previously lied to open sessions of Congress about Trump in the past. 

Remember, he told Congress that Trump was never under surveillance when he had been, and he refused to dispel the myth when asked in open session that an investigation into possible Trump ties with Russia was still under way.  We now know that investigation yielded nothing and that it was no longer going on.

This would laughable if it weren’t so serious.  Comey himself, had engaged in obstructing justice innumerable times in the past to protect Obama, his administration, as well as Hillary Clinton.  Similarly, Comey’s refusal or inability to determine the source(s) of the White House leaks amounts to a deliberate attempt on his part to help those undermining Trump and therefore his agenda.

Now in retrospect we can see Comey wasn’t protecting Democrats so much as he was protecting the status quo.  And so are the scumbags we sent to Congress.  It’s becoming obvious Comey had survived for as long as he did because refused to prosecute criminal acts committed by President Obama, his administration, and members of Congress, not because he did.

Much is being said about Trump’s need to clean house and surround himself with a staff of loyalists.  This would lead to a bunker mentality and inhibit the president’s ability to hear from all Americans and all sides of the issues that they elected him to address.

A far more effective house cleaning should be conducted by voters to the Congress and the Senate where members have spent decades proving their campaign promises were nothing more than lies and that they have no interest in addressing any of the issues that they were sent to Washington to fix.

Impeachment is a political process as much or more than it is a legal process.  It’s time to be resolute in our support of President Trump or content our selves to forever live under the thump of a government that answers only to corporations, foreign entities, and billionaires.

It’s your choice.  If the establishment succeeds in stripping us of Trump’s leadership then it will be time to lock and load.

HERE Is WHAT WILL HAPPEN If The DEEP STATE TAKES DOWN PRESIDENT TRUMP & It’s NOT PRETTY … FOR THEM “The tree of liberty must be refreshed with the blood of patriots and tyrants.” – Thomas Jefferson ELDER PATRIOT – Corrupt politicians ignore Jefferson’s directive to their own detriment. It’s no longer political, it’s personal. Americans have had their eyes opened by the ascension of Donald Trump and no amount of leftwing money can put the Freedom Movement genie back in the bottle. Conservative Senator Ted Cruz made that observation after reviewing the results of the 2016 elections and the expectations of the voters. Cruz, who had the most high profile personality clash with Donald Trump during the Republican primary process nevertheless embraced Trump’s America First agenda and said, “If we’re given the White House and both houses of Congress and we don’t deliver, I think there will be pitchforks and torches in the streets. And I think quite rightly.” Candidate Trump promised many things – border control, lower taxes, fairer trade relations, a balanced budget, healthcare that puts the people first not the government, safer communities, and – to the extent possible – an end to foreign wars. What, among those promises, should any Republican, nay any American, have a problem with? After four months without a single legislative achievement, Congressional and Senatorial Republicans – notably John McCain, Paul Ryan and Lindsey Graham – have joined the Democrats in investigating President Trump absent a single shred of evidence that an underlying crime has been committed. So, what gives? Well, there was one additional promise that Trump made on his way to the White House that has some Republicans joining with Democrats and quaking in their boots, Trump’s promise to “Drain the Swamp.” As we reported yesterday, “An F.B.I. agent with ‘intimate knowledge of the inner workings of the Clinton case’ told us that they uncovered evidence of such massive corruption that the agents involved realized that damned near the entire government could be brought down.” The criminal co-conspirators in both parties realized almost immediately that the new sheriff wasn’t interested in joining them in the swamp so they launched, what can only be characterized as, a coup attempt. Democrats are well schooled in such things probably because of their close alliance with Marxist regimes that can only gain power by seizing it through bloody civil wars. It should be noted that the Democratic Party has already done this once before. One Hundred and Fifty-Seven years ago the Democrats waged a war against the First Republican President Abraham Lincoln for giving Blacks their freedom. That war came at a high price, as many as 700,000 Americans died fighting for what they believe in. To put that in perspective, these casualties exceed the nation’s loss in all its other wars, from the Revolution through Vietnam. Today, Americans are still prepared to fight and die to protect their children’s God-given freedoms. Despite what you are reading and hearing in the mainstream media, they aren’t the leftwing-funded rioters, the pussy hat-wearing feminists, or the cuck bois that cant handle a micro aggression. No, the Americans that back Donald Trump are well armed. Donald Trump’s presidency will move forward politically lest the sixty million patriots who voted for him, that are comprised of the large majority of military voters, police, and NRA members, move it forward by force. These patriots are armed, trained, prepared, and have proven their discipline. They have grown disgusted by the corruption in Washington and will do whatever is necessary to make sure Trump’s Freedom Agenda moves forward and under the direction of Donald Trump himself. No amount of fake news based on unsubstantiated charges by unnamed sources is going to change that. The battle lines have been drawn and no amount of finger pointing is going to convince these patriots to let anyone overturn the election results. So why are establishment politicians courting a bloodbath on the streets of America that will also threaten them personally when they could be part of Making America Great Again? It’s because they have been caught red-handed and up to their eyeballs in a worldwide criminal conspiracy that has nothing to do with politics and everything to do with defrauding the American taxpayers. And, now that they’ve been caught robbing the world’s largest bank – the U.S. treasury – they have chosen to go out in a blaze of glory rather than try to defend the indefensible at trial. Washington’s criminal elites have chosen to go to war to unseat our duly elected president. It’s time to make our voices heard before this turns very ugly. Buckle your chin strap, America is counting on you. EDITORS NOTE: THIS IS NOT A CALL TO ARMS BUT RATHER AN ANALYSIS OF WHAT WOULD HAPPEN IF THE DEEP STATES OVERTURNS A DUELY ELECTED PRESIDENT. HERE IS A LIST OF EVERY SINGLE TIME OBAMA COMMITTED AN IMPEACHABLE OFFENSE THAT DEMS & MEDIA COVERED UP “Impeach!” It’s been more than eight years since Democrats uttered that word – long enough for anyone to wonder if it was still in their vocabulary, considering the deafening silence through the dozens of serious scandals during President Obama’s administration – but now that President Trump is the man in the White House, it’s back with a vengeance. Democrats everywhere are wildly slinging the “I” word, hoping to nail Trump for high crimes and misdemeanors after the New York Times claimed a memo written by former FBI Director James Comey said the president urged him to end the federal investigation into former national security adviser Michael Flynn. Some members of Congress are getting in on the action. They include Reps. Maxine Water, D-Calif., and Al Green, D-Texas. Even a Republican, Rep. Justin Amash, claimed Wednesday there are grounds to impeach President Trump. House Oversign Committee Chair Rep. Jason Chaffetz, R-Utah, asked for the alleged Comey memo and other documents. Chaffetz tweeted that he is prepared to subpoena the information. And Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., invoked “Watergate.” Now the Democratic Party is reportedly poll testing impeachment as a 2018 election issue. More than 1 million people signed a petition calling on Congress to impeach Trump. Wasting no time Wednesday, the mainstream media sprang into action, enthusiastically echoing the left’s impeachment calls. MSNBC launched a Watergate ad implying Trump is America’s new Richard Nixon. “Watergate. We know its name because there were reporters who never stopped asking questions,” says MSNBC host Chris Hayes, who hinted that Trump is next on the impeachment chopping block. “Now, who knows where the questions will take us. But I know this: I’m not going to stop asking them.” Meanwhile, some overzealous members of the left plastered fliers around Washington, D.C., demanding all White House staffers resign Wednesday. The posters read: “If you work for this White House you are complicit in hate-mongering, lies, corrupt taking of Americans’ tax money via self-dealing and emoluments, and quite possibly federal crimes and treason. Also, any wars will be on your soul. … Resign now.” But constitutional scholar Jonathan Turley, who voted for President Obama, warned “impeachment” enthusiasts not to get ahead of themselves with President Trump. Why? At this time, there’s no evidence Trump actually committed a crime. “The criminal code demands more than what Comey reportedly describes in his memo,” Turley wrote in a May 17 opinion piece posted at the Hill. Turley explained: For the first time, the Comey memo pushes the litany of controversies surrounding Trump into the scope of the United States criminal code. However, if this is food for obstruction of justice, it is still an awfully thin soup. Some commentators seem to be alleging criminal conduct in office or calling for impeachment before Trump completed the words of his inaugural oath of office. Not surprising, within minutes of the New York Times report, the response was a chorus of breathless “gotcha” announcements. But this memo is neither the Pentagon Papers nor the Watergate tapes. Indeed, it raises as many questions for Comey as it does Trump in terms of the alleged underlying conduct. A good place to start would be with the federal law, specifically 18 U.S.C. 1503. The criminal code demands more than what Comey reportedly describes in his memo. There are dozens of different variations of obstruction charges ranging from threatening witnesses to influencing jurors. None would fit this case. That leaves the omnibus provision on attempts to interfere with the “due administration of justice.” However, that still leaves the need to show that the effort was to influence “corruptly” when Trump could say that he did little but express concern for a longtime associate. The term “corruptly” is actually defined differently under the various obstruction provisions, but it often involves a showing that someone acted “with the intent to secure an unlawful benefit for oneself or another.” Encouraging leniency or advocating for an associate is improper but not necessarily seeking an unlawful benefit for him. . Obama’s Iran nuke deal Obama knew about Hillary’s private email server Obama IRS targets conservatives Obama’s DOJ spies on AP reporters Obamacare & Obama’s false promises Illegal-alien amnesty by executive order Benghazi-gate Operation Fast & Furious 5 Taliban leaders for Bergdahl Extortion 17 ‘Recess ‘ appointments – when Senate was in session Appointment of ‘czars’ without Senate approval Suing Arizona for enforcing federal law Refusal to defend Defense of Marriage Act Illegally conducting war against Libya NSA: Spying on Americans Muslim Brotherhood ties Miriam Carey Birth certificate Executive orders Solyndra and the lost $535 million Egypt Cap & Trade: When in doubt, bypass Congress Refusal to prosecute New Black Panthers Obama’s U.S. citizen ‘hit list’