DISTRESSING REALITY – DOJ Above the Law: Mueller’s Office Scrubbed Evidence From Strzok, Page Phones

Elder Patriot –  It’s only due to President Trump’s steel spine and resolute determination to return the United States and its government to the American people that he is outlasting the corrupt elements running rampant inside our government.

Special counsel Robert Mueller, despite  broad prosecutorial powers, and having abused even those tyrannical powers, has been thwarted in accomplishing, what can only be viewed as, his mission to remove Donald Trump from the presidency.

Mueller’s office is both above the law and beneath contempt.

Inspector General Michael Horowitz’s latest report was made public yesterday and in another striking example of the police state we have devolved into, we have learned that the cell phones of two of Mueller’s investigators had been wiped clean having been reset to factory condition.

After failing to make the case for Trump-Russia collusion, obstruction of justice, etc., many of us have grown cynical that the special counsel’s real purpose is to build a roadblock to the truth, not to discover it.

Sundance at the Conservative Treehouse explained:

♦(1) Create a Special Counsel investigation – By creating the investigation it is then used as a shield by any corrupt FBI/DOJ official who would find himself/herself under downstream congressional investigation.  Former officials being deposed/questioned by IG Horowitz or Congress could then say they are unable to answer those questions due to the ongoing special counsel investigation.  In this way Mueller provides cover for officials.

♦(2)  Use the investigation to keep any and all inquiry focused away from the corrupt DOJ and FBI activity that took place in 2016, 2016, 2017.  Keep the media narrative looking somewhere, anywhere, other than directly at the epicenter of the issues. In this way, Mueller provides distraction and talking points against the Trump administration.

♦(3) Use the investigation to suck-up, absorb, any damaging investigative material that might surface as a result of tangentially related inquiry. Example: control the exposure of evidence against classified leak participants like SSCI Director of Security, James Wolfe. In this way Mueller provides cover for the institutions and the administrative state.  (my link)

♦(4) Use the authority within the investigation, and the control parameters therein, to keep those involved in the original conspiracy informed about any evidence against them.

The “destruction” of exculpatory evidence should be especially concerning to average Joes and Janes who do not have the advantage of being involved in high-profile cases that command media attention and who are therefore left powerless to challenge an out-of-control lawfare system.

The mercenary propagandist media is in place to mute those concerns by turning this into political warfare rather than reasoned legal jurisprudence.

On Wednesday, Judge Emmet Sullivan who is overseeing the Michael Flynn sentencing plea, appears to have signaled concerns that the special counsel is hiding exculpatory evidence that could clear Flynn altogether, when he issued this order:

Why is Mueller fixated on the guilty plea (on one count of making a false statement to the FBI) of Trump’s former National Security Advisor, Lieutenant General Michael Flynn?

Could it be because Flynn’s scalp would be the only member of President Trump’s White House team he is likely to get?

More troubling is the likelihood that the scrubbing of Page and Strzok’s phones was a deliberate act that did not occur by accident.

And, even more troubling than that is the deliberate destruction of digital evidence seems to be becoming provably endemic within the DOJ and FBI.

Harken back to former FBI Director James Comey’s exoneration of Hillary Clinton following the mid-year exam.  Comey oversaw the FBI during the destruction of Clinton’s illegal server, as well as the personal devices of her associates.  More than a dozen devices – perhaps double that number – were ordered destroyed along with the evidence contained on them.

All future probative value – as is now warranted – was lost.

Additionally, what email evidence remained was first handed over to HRC’s attorneys who filtered through it prior to delivering it to the FBI.  In what world do investigators allow defense attorneys to determine the evidence they can use?

Then there was the fact that Comey accepted the findings of a contractor paid for by the DNC rather than demand the server be turned over to the FBI for analysis by the agency’s world-class forensics lab.

Since when does the F.B.I. outsource investigations into intrusions that threaten our national security?

When the institutions are corrupt; and the officials within the institutions are corrupt; and there is inquiry into the corrupt activity of the officials within the institutions; then retaining the institutions is the priority.  It’s that simple. If you take down the institution you run the risk of exposing the corruption.Sundance