ELDER PATRIOT – During the third debate Hillary Clinton said, “You know, every time Donald thinks things aren’t going in his direction, he claims whatever it is, is rigged against him.” As with almost every accusation she came up with about her opponent during the run-up to the election it better fit her than Donald Trump.
This was evident once again on Thursday when she was forced to explain to her high level donors how she lost to a political neophyte after they had given her the money to outspend Trump by a 5 to 1 margin and with the full weight of the mainstream media behind her.
Mrs. Clinton’s latest excuse is that the hacking attacks carried out by Russia against her campaign and the Democratic National Committee were ordered by Vladimir V. Putin “because he has a personal beef against me.”
Poor baby. Vladimir doesn’t play nice. She’s just now finding this out?
Here’s a novel idea Hillary, you should’ve ordered the members of your campaign team and the staff at the DNC to have properly secured the servers they were using.
Especially considering that the breach of the campaigns’ computers occurred well after her use of a private and unsecured sever while she was Secretary of State had been discovered and widely reported. She has only herself to blame for continuing to play fast and loose with confidential information.
This latest excuse comes after having previously blamed FBI Director James Comey for undermining her campaign when he exonerated her. Yeah, you read that correctly. He exonerated her after allowing her attorneys to dispose of at least 30,000 emails based on their own judgment and never putting her under oath. Regardless, Comey still needed twenty minutes to list all of the federal laws she had violated before he gave her a get out of jail free card.
Clinton’s defense is similar to those used by criminal defense attorneys when the evidence against their client is overwhelming and irrefutable – move to have the jury barred from hearing it based on it having been gotten in violation of the law.
Hillary would like us to view the damning evidence against her that the emails revealed as the result of an illegal search and seizure and therefore it should be inadmissible in judging her as though voters are jurors in a court of law.
Unfortunately for the delusional deposed criminal queenpin the election was decided in a different court – the court of public opinion.