Barack Obama’s Design to Poison America Continues

ELDER PATRIOT – If you thought we saw the last of B. Hussein Obama on January 20, 2017 then you’re in for a sad awakening.  Early in his presidency Rush Limbaugh warned that the damage Obama would be able to do to our republic might not be remedied for decades, if ever.

It’s doubtful that Rush anticipated Obama setting up an actual command center and having the massive funding of progressive billionaire Marxists to run a counter-government steeped in using street violence, in exile after his term.

Making matters even worse, we’re forced to continue paying for many aspects of Obama’s continued destruction of America’s borders, cultural identity, and economy.  This includes paying for the Washington D.C. command center that Obama uses to orchestrate the Trump resistance movement.  Just as troubling are the salaries and benefits we pay the subversives that he planted everywhere throughout the government and especially inside the federal judiciary, before being evicted by Trump.

Obama’s insistence on leading the resistance should be viewed as nothing less than his refusal to accept the peaceful transition of power that has marked our democratic republic since our nation’s inception.

The current difficulty in ending his Obamacare debacle pales by comparison to full extent of the damage he’s inflicted on every American institution and that threatens our very freedoms.

Healthcare can be fixed virtually overnight if the Republicans can summon the political will to do so.  Or, if the Democrats do.  Fixing the federal judiciary will take decades regardless of who the voters elect to represent them over the next forty years.

Take the example of U.S. District Court Judge William H. Orrick III who recently ruled against President Trump’s executive order defunding sanctuary cities.

Orrick deserves a strict reprimand and censure for failing to recuse him self in the case.  Justice demands absolute impartiality on the part of the judge, which is something Orrick provably cannot provide.

Orrick has an established record of bias on this issue:

  • After donating more than $30,000 personally, and bundling more than $200,000 to B. Hussein Obama, Orrick was rewarded with the position he holds today.
  • Obama plucked Orrick from the Justice Department where he oversaw the Office of Immigration Litigation.  While at Justice Orrick ignored existing federal law and followed the Obama administration’s mandate not to pursue sanctuary cities that were violating the 1996 federal law requiring them to cooperate with federal immigration agencies like ICE.
  • This made Orrick a co-conspirator in the growth of sanctuary cities and yet now he sits in judgment of them.

Canon 2 of the Code of Conduct for federal judges covers Orrick’s situation: “A judge should avoid impropriety and the appearance of impropriety in all activities”.  The judge must, “act at all times in a manner that promotes public confidence in the integrity and impartiality of the judiciary.”    

28 U.S. Code § 455 – Disqualification of justice, judge, or magistrate judge, “Any justice, judge, or magistrate judge of the United States shall disqualify himself in any proceeding in which his impartiality might reasonably be questioned.

It’s obvious that Orrick’s mind was already made up before he heard arguments in this case.

Armed with this background information it’s hard to see what Democrats based their recusal demand of Attorney General Jeff Sessions on.

Orrick is representative of the literally hundreds of activist judges who are prepared to ignore and otherwise subvert the existing laws of the land whenever and wherever President Trump or his Justice Department attempt to enforce them. 

This disregard for the law isn’t limited to federal judges, either.  The abuse of laws that protect individuals in municipal and state courts is even more egregious and borders on outright tyranny, if you can believe it.

Virtually every one of the federal judges that disregard the law to advance their political agendas were appointed by B. Hussein Obama and Bill Clinton.

The decision in this case by judge Orrick has a high probability of being reversed on appeal and almost certainly by SCOTUS.

The federal government’s authority to use the threat of withholding funds to effect broad compliance by the states was established by the Lautenberg Amendment when Congress mandated a nationwide 18-year old drinking age and backed it by threatening to withhold federal highway funding to any state that refused to comply.

Regardless, the damage to our country continues to accrue from the existence of sanctuary cities, people are dying, debt is compounding, our culture in being eviscerated, and all while Obama laughs to himself from his command center less than two miles from the White House.

And, some of these judges may be poisoning our country even after Obama has passed from this earth.

We have one thing going for us – President Trump has proven his resolve. He will not abandon America and he will never abandon the fight.